X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:28:59 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-6615353@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <snopercod@comporium.net>
Received: from rc5-smtp.comporium.net ([208.104.2.19] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7)
  with ESMTP id 6615342 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:26:49 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.104.2.19; envelope-from=snopercod@comporium.net
Received: from rg25.comporium.net ([208.104.244.60])
          by rc5-smtp.comporium.net ({548c1f54-a96b-4a18-a171-d2818e6ccf4d})
          via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20131126182616845;
          Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:26:16 +0000
X-RC-FROM: <snopercod@comporium.net>
Received: from 33.225.235.68.dsl.brvdnc.dynamic.citcom.Net (EHLO _127.0.0.1_) ([68.235.225.33])
	by rg24.comporium.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA FastPath queued)
	with ESMTP id PMK18642 (AUTH snopercod);
	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:26:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-Message-ID: <5294E7C4.4070701@comporium.net>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:26:12 -0500
From: John Cooper <snopercod@comporium.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>, lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: A couple Tyco papers on emf reduction in relays
References: <5294D189.6010105@comporium.net> <2DA93701-6990-4A8A-B2C4-5CCAD72CB50D@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <2DA93701-6990-4A8A-B2C4-5CCAD72CB50D@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MAG-OUTBOUND: comporium.redcondor.net@208.104.244.48/28

On 11/26/2013 12:37 PM, Colyn Case wrote:
> I'm not sure you will really see the inrush current with the shunt.  Too slow.
My Fluke 87-V has a 250uS response time in the Min-Max mode, which I'm 
hoping will capture most of the inrush current spike. We'll see...