X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:01:17 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6604045 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 10:52:40 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.46; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id kl14so1918979pab.33 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:52:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.217.129 with SMTP id oy1mr21416921pbc.23.1384789924833; Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:52:04 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.121] (c-208-53-115-208.customer.broadstripe.net. [208.53.115.208]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qz9sm22990179pbc.3.2013.11.18.07.52.03 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:52:03 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B554a) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Sleep apnea X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:52:03 -0800 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Ok, I get it that if two commercial pilots or one or any carrying a load of p= assengers would have unreasonable risk factors if they are nodding off to sl= eep during their flights. Maybe this needs to be an ATP rating requirement.= However, can you honestly say someone with this condition is more dangerous= to the public than the sleep apnea'd driver of a car on a busy two lane str= eet with or without passengers? =20 I think the answer is a resounding no and would think that we should address= the bigger problem before we tackle the little one. John Barrett N31VP Sent from my iPad > On Nov 18, 2013, at 5:45 AM, R Douglas Owen wrote: >=20 > I have a comment regarding the recent FAA rule regarding sleep apnea.=20 >=20 > I am a senior aviation medical examiner, a board certified family doc, and= a IV-P turbine builder and pilot. >=20 > During the evaluation of patients with sleep apnea, I have encountered peo= ple who have arousals (mini wake up episodes) as often as 30 to 60 times per= hour. This could mean that the average length of restful restorative sleep a= mounts to one or two minutes at a time throughout the night. This condition i= s generally associated with low oxygen levels in the body. As aviators, we d= o know the ill effects of hypoxia on the body systems. These individuals t= ypically awaken with marked fatigue; often feeling just as tired when they w= ake up as when they went to bed. >=20 > Morbid obesity [BMI (body mass index - a mathematical ratio of weight vs h= eight) > 40 - not just those of us who need to lose a few pounds] has a str= ong correlation with sleep problems.=20 >=20 > As a passenger on the flights that I am not able to take my Lancair, I wou= ld like to hope that the pilot is at his best, having had more than a 1 minu= te stretch of sleep throughout the night. Typically I do not have the option= to check out the pilot and choose to stay behind if I wanted to. >=20 > The FAA primary mandate is to try to assure the safety of the public. Thou= gh not all morbidly obese people have sleep apnea, obesity is a significant r= isk factor - particularly for the morbidly obese with a BMI > 40. It does no= t seem unreasonable to me to apply some screening process to consider evalua= tion for pilots who may be at risk. >=20 > It is my understanding that this rule was presented after a commercial cre= w (the captain did have a diagnosis of sleep apnea that was not treated, the= first officer just was tired, but without sleep apnea) BOTH went to sleep a= nd overflew the destination by 25 miles before they happened to wake up. >=20 > Though none of us appreciate the government poking its nose into our busi= ness, in my opinion it is very logical to assess the morbidly obese pilot fo= r a condition that may well be very critical to the safety of all aboard the= aircraft.=20 >=20 > Doug Owen > Sent from my iPad > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l