X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.65] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6575694 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:10:47 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.65; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=CVCAJIaUxT+o47PKWDC4gSkPQElaPTqqZFHAyVoW48EOUlom8yplVN/AvL5AxdDw; h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [70.16.215.180] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1VdIyx-0007XP-67 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 07:10:11 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Subject: Re: [LML] GAMI lean test IO550N From: Colyn Case In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 07:10:10 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0DFFCA65-CD45-4D3F-A1CC-935E86F5C27A@earthlink.net> References: To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9400931cb699e5d85c86fd77ce47d6282f8350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 70.16.215.180 Paul, I take it your engine monitor rounds to the nearest 5 dF on = EGT's? If so, it makes it a little harder to tell exactly where the peaks are. = You could have a .9 gph spread or a .5 gph spread depending.=20 You might get a little better data if now that you know the range of = interest you step through in FF increments of .1 gph from 14.6 to 13.7 = (stepping through more coarsely from the ROP side to make sure you don't = miss the first peak) Colyn On Nov 3, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Paul Miller wrote: I haven't run a lean test on this IO550N before. I've never removed = the injectors in 768 hours. On my way from Calgary to central Florida (one stop in Omaha, never done = that before) I ran the lean test with the following basic results. I'm = interested in any feedback from this graph. I ran this test at 9500 feet = and by the end the test was getting about 230TAS and all CHTs below 300 = LOP. I had good tailwinds so I was grounding 270K and flew Calgary to = Omaha on 51G of avgas at 13,500. As usual, I did that entire trip VFR = with great help all the way from controllers. Paul Legacy RG PS: Over the Atlanta arrival route I was asked to remain at 13,500 until = clear. I encountered the top of a misty mountain for about 15 seconds. = The windshield had some light crystals which disappeared immediately. = The wing leading edge had 1/16 inch of very light rime (I could see the = line down through the landing light cover) like a white pencil lead = laying spanwise along the leading edge. You could barely see it. I'm = sure the prop had something similar. I lost 20-25 knots in a heartbeat = and never got it back for half an hour. It was -6C.