X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:02:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ns3.properformance.no ([89.221.244.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.6) with ESMTPS id 6441211 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 17:48:56 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=89.221.244.202; envelope-from=roger@iverin.com Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43880 helo=webmail.iverin.com) by ns3.properformance.no with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VDiAS-0000sc-RZ for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:48:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 23:48:16 +0200 From: Roger Iverin X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Sandblasting engine =?UTF-8?Q?mount=3F?= In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Message-ID: <130f71d2227a3e729ea5172ffda48ad0@iverin.com> X-Sender: roger@iverin.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9.2 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns3.properformance.no X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - iverin.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ns3.properformance.no: authenticated_id: iverin01@iverin.com Gents, I had my engine mount stripped and eddie current check. All OK. After I delivered this ready stripped mount for powder coating. They struggled to remove the WD40 anti corrision before powder coating. So they started sandblasting the mount, but stopped after one brace. My question is: Is it ok to sandblast the rest? I don't think the engine mount have any treatment destroyed? Best regards Roger Iverin