Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 09:17:33 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-6440842@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.89; envelope-from=casey.gary@yahoo.com
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=LPM31QMWk3T4+xrNdbmGXFvn5AoIxEYYMLHI5bEamUDmQlcNPD5I6nNuWYBNa9DF4PzRU1vwBXeejdDQd1tG2bRSYWTPFgFNNQ3DOmOtHJoCugrLnCEWBIUG/TmveB+zBsexXa3Upf/lYzl6WgV8Ds0vp6kIHEtbKZqEZsyPm7A=;
References: <listdigest-6439910@logan.com>
From: Gary Casey <casey.gary@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: Gary Casey <casey.gary@yahoo.com>
Subject: Best propeller option
In-Reply-To: <listdigest-6439910@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-96787742-31406405-1377390688=:77961"

---96787742-31406405-1377390688=:77961
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A little bit ago the subject of propeller choice was brought up and it seem=
ed like three types came to the top: =A0The Hartzell, MT, and the Aerocompo=
sites. =A0Someone mention that the Aerocomposites prop has a reputation for=
 being "slow." =A0I have an Aerocomposites prop on my Lycoming-powered ES a=
nd am perfectly satisfied. =A0It think I get equivalent performance to ever=
yone else and I'm down probably 10 to 20 hp. =A0Is it better than any other=
? =A0I have no idea, but I know it's lighter than the Hartzell aluminum pro=
p. =A0I just didn't want to let the "slower" comment go unanswered. =A0Than=
ks for listening, er, reading :-)=0AGary Casey
---96787742-31406405-1377390688=:77961
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body><div style=3D"color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:bo=
okman old style, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>A little bit a=
go the subject of propeller choice was brought up and it seemed like three =
types came to the top: &nbsp;The Hartzell, MT, and the Aerocomposites. &nbs=
p;Someone mention that the Aerocomposites prop has a reputation for being "=
slow." &nbsp;I have an Aerocomposites prop on my Lycoming-powered ES and am=
 perfectly satisfied. &nbsp;It think I get equivalent performance to everyo=
ne else and I'm down probably 10 to 20 hp. &nbsp;Is it better than any othe=
r? &nbsp;I have no idea, but I know it's lighter than the Hartzell aluminum=
 prop. &nbsp;I just didn't want to let the "slower" comment go unanswered. =
&nbsp;Thanks for listening, er, reading :-)</div><div>Gary Casey</div>  </d=
iv></body></html>
---96787742-31406405-1377390688=:77961--