X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:23:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6421525 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:14:55 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.54; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx10so2218970pab.13 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.248.161 with SMTP id yn1mr4794662pac.0.1376680461296; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.0.14] (71-212-113-36.tukw.qwest.net. [71.212.113.36]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id yg1sm3707966pbb.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:19 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Message-Id: <1953CCF3-7074-4D50-86DD-A8FF7EB676B9@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Compass calibration X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 12:14:18 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Speaking of calibration I have been meaning to ask a burning question about T= ru Trak a/p. mine is confused about heading. It is usually 30 degrees or m= ore off of actual heading. Is there a calibration mode for the A/P? My device not infrequently messages that it wants to shut off and some times= it does. At other times it has introduced errant output to the point I hav= e to disconnect to avoid making unwanted attitude changes. A few times I've= had it not want to let go and I have had to do the equivalent of popping th= e c/b. =20 It seems to be doing this less and less and maybe the a/p heading is gradual= ly getting closer to the Cheltons. =20 Any thoughts? John Barrett Sent from my iPad On Aug 16, 2013, at 11:42 AM, "Dan Schaefer" wrote: > By the way all, be aware that in many parts of the country, the magnetic f= ield lines have shifted enough to change runway numbers. my home field (KCOE= , Coeur d'Alene, Idaho) had to renumber the runways recently - Rnwy 1/29 bec= ame 2/20 and 5/23 became 6/24. Be sure to check whether the airport where yo= u do your calibration has changed recently and if field compass rose (if the= re is one) has been updated to match it or you will mis-calibrate your compa= ss. >=20 > Dan Schaefer=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l