X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:23:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm2-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.224] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6421418 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:44:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.91.224; envelope-from=chris_zavatson@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.101.129] by nm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2013 17:43:33 -0000 Received: from [98.138.101.176] by tm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2013 17:43:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1087.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 16 Aug 2013 17:43:33 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 455958.25709.bm@omp1087.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53125 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Aug 2013 17:43:33 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=29z7Kq16XpgalDdVnEPzWzhL5uQrbmFFFCvSt0vs4VaVnJ9dE2Bw0WABsuwDcnLHW8uM0UXhbJJlX+FHnSO3FslxKezYghLNwWnTrxhAE3jtzGKT/MkHhHEJGb3r5tTMUtlBF5hsxjihAAQcLDRrkPHHpOsJmxasNPOLBH0UqXk=; X-YMail-OSG: yJ1Kvo0VM1mu3KwsUrcwOY9Df0q06TSzs.ADUnV_zhNMiSG c71stwXTl9afnPDZfDxXcScaib6poLFceIhr_GELccQqMOCCstbSMWeAWp6a 89GjaCoDnO8js6JeZnFaOTX7kbnPPn68na6i2FbqtgT2lDsdPIuyiW8yC10A NEnd1qrhXOYaR8Z0aEMe.M9LW6SfZ99XlTQZ9DmtJ.AgbDEs_BuzamD8z55t wClXt4qe5SKEqcdZ2.GhFCHmAyMnXRpVTjVI9BEfDJuwqbrad9bPtTQhVHyh cRwXrmSSXchP8JelL..f8fAnIiDPgXem4iHkYnjPTnWzYwhMo.84Q0.QZnZl 5zLGb.VdN_VePxdD6yLUQFcjX83cAh6.UNX_ueErFSW4pdBvOz9b84re9asu jYTlFffqu7Wh.9sOVzRrFPklIBXM7NjiB1TvBZjPpIraLwvO09L5cjKNnkQu tJQUuU8W08PA..V4_Zfa20mCU1rET8TmoSQU637an6XA2HMc1DHj6zflyhIR vmWAWYavdWCZXpB4nXbjfMoi432NhtyXwNvWxbEcXbbPFeQNm4pwsaW6z3J2 GTIJ9TVW5UaaHVdAu.3d7D6ZLKGQlEWEsvuUeUVPgdypwrLSo7Ce2AeqIfl8 xNczMZvwtCgI.mdZ1G1iIv7R_v5FXB6M- Received: from [172.14.16.72] by web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:43:33 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,QmlsbCwKVGhhdCBicmluZ3MgdXAgYSBpbnRlcmVzdGluZyB0b3BpYzrCoCBDYXJiIEhlYXQuwqAgCkxvbmcgYWdvIHdoZW4gcmlnZ2luZyB1cCBjYXJiIGhlYXQgb24gbXkgMzYwLCBJIG1lYXN1cmVkIHRoZSB0ZW1wZXJhdHVyZSByaXNlIG9mZmVyZWQgdXAgYnkgb3VywqB0aW55IDMyMC8zNjDCoGhlYXQgbXVmZnMuwqAgTHljb21pbmcgd2FudGVkIHRvIHNlZSBhIDc1IGRlZ3JlZXMgcmlzZS7CoCBJIHdhcyBtZWFzdXJpbmcgbm93aGVyZSBjbG9zZSB0byB0aGF0LsKgIEkgcmUtcGx1bWJlZCB0byBwdWxsIGMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.154.571 References: X-Original-Message-ID: <1376675013.51686.YahooMailNeo@web121601.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:43:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Zavatson Reply-To: Chris Zavatson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Flaps on take-off? X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1977980688-782147457-1376675013=:51686" ---1977980688-782147457-1376675013=:51686 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill,=0AThat brings up a interesting topic:=C2=A0 Carb Heat.=C2=A0 =0ALong = ago when rigging up carb heat on my 360, I measured the temperature rise of= fered up by our=C2=A0tiny 320/360=C2=A0heat muffs.=C2=A0 Lycoming wanted to= see a 75 degrees rise.=C2=A0 I was measuring nowhere close to that.=C2=A0 = I re-plumbed to pull carb heat air from under the engine so that I could ut= ilize engine heat plus the heat muff.=C2=A0 Now I had something useful.=0AA= t the same time I tried to find NTSB reports with carb icing as a cause.=C2= =A0 I came up empty for Lycomings.=C2=A0 It appeared they were more immune.= =C2=A0 The carb is bolted to a very large heat source - the oil sump.=C2=A0= So once the oil is warm it seemed to offer up some protection.=C2=A0 =0ALy= coming is most concerned about carb ice at part power operation.=C2=A0 I ha= ve a TC in my carb and monitored temperatures during part power.=C2=A0 They= actually went up.=C2=A0 -makes sense.=C2=A0 Less air to counter the heat c= oming in from the sump.=0AOperationally I do not operate at part power in h= umid conditions until after the oil has reached normal operating temperatur= es.=C2=A0 In other words, if I am going out to practice instruments approac= hes in our local fog, I spend a few minutes=C2=A0burning avgas=C2=A0at high= power first.=0AI am curious if anyone on the list has experienced carb ice= in a Lycoming and what the circumstances were surrounding the event.=C2=A0= I have never actually needed carb heat but I feel better knowing it is the= re.=0A=C2=A0=0AChris Zavatson=0AN91CZ=0A360std=0Ahttp://www.n91cz.net/=0A = =0A=0A________________________________=0A From: Bill Bradburry =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net =0ASent: Friday, August 16, 2013= 5:00 AM=0ASubject: [LML] Re: Flaps on take-off?=0A =0A=0A=0A =0AMy next d= oor hangar mate was practicing=0AILS approaches at night and forgot to put = on carb heat.=C2=A0 He wound up in an=0Aorange grove.=C2=A0 Destroyed his R= V-6 but no one injured. =0A=C2=A0 =0AB2 =0A=0A_____________________________= ___=0A =0AFrom:Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Beha= lf Of Jim Nordin=0ASent: Thursday, August 15, 2013=0A9:39 PM=0ATo: lml@lanc= aironline.net=0ASubject: [LML] Flaps on take-off? =0A=C2=A0 =0AI know how = an engine fails in the close=0Apattern environment. Decent from altitude an= d forget to richen the engine.=0AHappened to a friend while I was in the pl= ane (ES) as copilot. Why did it=0Ahappen? His wife normally is co-pilot and= I didn=E2=80=99t prompt him with the=0Averbal clues he needed. Very close = to touch down it just quit. No problem as we=0Awere only 100=C2=B1 feet abo= ve the ground and nearly at the numbers. Scary=0Anonetheless =E2=80=93 most= ly after everything was on the ground and rolling out=0Asafely. He didn=E2= =80=99t waver from the task of landing - engine or no. =0AJim =0A=C2=A0 =0A= =0A________________________________=0A =0AFrom:Lancair Mailing List [mailt= o:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Lancair-ESP=0ASent: Thursday, August = 15, 2013=0A5:25 PM=0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0ASubject: [LML] Re: FW: [LM= L] Flaps=0Aon take-off? =0A=C2=A0 =0ABill, =0A=C2=A0 =0AWhat you describe = is=0Acertainly a possible scenario =E2=80=93 actually that sounds like my t= ypical=0Aarrival.=C2=A0 With the engine pulled back to 10-12=E2=80=9D and a= windmilling=0Aprop the decent rate should be similar zero power and a feat= hered prop. =C2=A0 =0A=C2=A0 =0ABut how likely is an engine that fails in= =0Athe close pattern after a cross-country flight?=C2=A0 More likely someth= ing would go afoul enroute, when the=0Apilot could select a landing spot an= d arrive 2000 ft above it. =C2=A0If not=0Aable to arrive 2000 ft agl =E2=80= =93 choose an alternate spot. =0A=C2=A0 =0AJust my couple lira=0A. . . =0A= =C2=A0 =0ARobert =0A=C2=A0 =0AFrom:Bill Bradburry=0A[mailto:bbradburry@bell= south.net] =0ASent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013=0A2:06 PM=0ATo: lml@lancairo= nline.net=0ASubject: RE: [LML] FW: [LML] Flaps=0Aon take-off? =0A=C2=A0 = =0ARobert, =0A=C2=A0 =0AYou should try it under conditions that are=0Amore = likely to be the case.=C2=A0 =0A=C2=A0 =0ADescend to pattern altitude, 100= 0 ft AGL,=0Aslow to pattern speed, and idle the engine abeam the numbers an= d see if you can=0Amake it =0A=C2=A0 =0AI recommend you idle the engine and= not=0Akill it, because I would be surprised if you do make it.=C2=A0 I als= o=0Adon=E2=80=99t recommend you coarse pitch the prop since you may need to= add power=0Afor the go around. =0A=C2=A0 =0ABill =0A=0A__________________= ______________=0A =0AFrom:Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.n= et] On Behalf Of Lancair-ESP=0ASent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013=0A11:18 AM= =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0ASubject: [LML] FW: [LML] Flaps on=0Atake-off= ? =0A=C2=A0 =0ABill, =0A=C2=A0 =0AI practiced that=0Amaneuver with a Lanca= ir company pilot flying my ES-P and found it a non-event.=C2=A0 =0AOverhea= d upwind at=0A2000 ft agl and slowing to pattern speed in the turn. =0ANo f= laps until over=0Athe fence then deployed everything and aimed for 1/3 down= the runway.=C2=A0 =0A=C2=A0 =0AI realize the IV=0Awould take different sp= eeds but it should still be do-able with a little=0Apractice. =0A=C2=A0 =0A= Robert =0AES-P N301ES =0A=C2=A0 =0AFrom:Bill Bradburry [mailto:bbradburry@b= ellsouth.net] =0ASent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013=0A9:26 AM=0ATo: lml@lancair= online.net=0ASubject: RE: [LML] Flaps on=0Atake-off? =0A=C2=A0 =0AThat se= ems a scenario where you would be=0Ain better shape with the flaps up.=C2= =A0 You very well might make the=0Arunway.=C2=A0 With flaps down, you likel= y would not and it would be very=0Adangerous to try and retract them.=C2=A0= With the high wing loading that all=0Athe Lancairs have, they are flying b= ricks with no power.=C2=A0 I think almost=0Anobody makes the approach to la= nd with no power. =0ARemember way back in primary training when=0Athe instr= uctor had you remove power abeam the numbers and make the landing=0Awithout= having to add power?=C2=A0 Does anyone practice that maneuver with=0Atheir= Lancair? =0A=C2=A0 =0ABill B =0A=C2=A0 =0A=0A_____________________________= ___=0A =0AFrom:Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Beha= lf Of Bill Hannahan=0ASent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013=0A6:33 AM=0ATo: lml@la= ncaironline.net=0ASubject: [LML] Flaps on take-off? =0A=C2=A0 =0AMatt, I= =0Aagree with the others that w's insults are inexcusable, but I must ask a= =0Aquestion. =0A=C2=A0 =0AWhat do you do if your low over the=0Adeparture= end of the runway and the engine quits? =0A=C2=A0 =0A1.=C2=A0 Land at hi= gh speed flaps up. =0A=C2=A0 =0A2.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Lower the flaps and deal= =0Awith the big trim and pitch change while making all the other decisions = and=0Aactions required in parallel. =0A=C2=A0 =0A3.=C2=A0=C2=A0 ? =0A=C2= =A0 =0ARegards, =0ABill=0AHannahan =0A=0Awfhannahan@yahoo.com =0A=C2=A0= =0A-----=0AForwarded Message -----=0AFrom:"marv@lancair.net"=0A=0ATo: lml =0ASent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:02=0APM=0ASubje= ct: [LML] Re: Flaps on=0Atake-off? =0A=C2=A0 =0A=0A=0A=0APosted for Matt l= osangeles :=0A=0A> I feel much safer adding 5 k= nots or so on the ground before I lift off so=0AI =0A>don't have to mess wi= th trim when I am low to the ground. I could see a =0A>scenario where I tak= e off IFR and I am immediately handed off to departure =0A>control while I = am putting the flaps up. They tell me to do something the =0A>requires me t= o look at my map and the next thing you know, while=0Adistracted, =0A>=C2= =A0I am at an unusual attitude really close to the ground. When I am=0Adown= low =0A>like that I want to make sure if I am distracted it isn't a proble= m, the =0A>plane just keeps on climbing along at Vy or so.=0A> =C2=A0=0A> I= also would guess if you use flaps on take off, this adds drag=C2=A0and=0As= lows =0A>your rate of climb (I have not tested this).=C2=A0I am able to be = at Vy a=0Acouple =0A>seconds after take off and I am going to get to a safe= r altitude before the =0A>guy using flaps (again, this is my guess since I = have not tested the two =0A>scenarios).=0A> =C2=A0=0A> Another thing. It is= an experimental aircraft. As it states on the =0A>EAA,=C2=A0"There is=C2= =A0=C2=A0no FAA approved flight manual or POH=0Afor experimental =0A>aircra= ft, nor is there a=C2=A0=C2=A0TC".=C2=A0 =0A> =C2=A0=0A> Ohh, what about th= ose reno =0Aracer Legacy aircraft that have just bonded thier =0A>flaps in = place so they can't go down in order to eliminate the drag of the =0A>hindg= es. I guess they are not flying those aircraft the way they were meant =0A>= to be flown. You could argue they are reno =0Aracers I suppose. It is also = =0A>likely they are using those planes the other 51 weeks out of the year t= o=0Afly =0A>all over the place and those planes don't seem to be crashing o= n takeoff.=0A> =C2=A0=0A> "I believe everyone would agree that flaps do add= a margin of=0Asafety"=0A> =C2=A0I personally consider myself part of every= one and I don't agree that=0Aflaps =0A>do in fact add a margin of safety on= take off. I use them on landing so I=0Acan =0A>see out the window and out = of habit I suppose.=C2=A0If the speed you land=0Aat makes =0A>such a differ= ence, then the best thing to be doing is flying a plane that =0A>lands at a= slower speed.=0A> =C2=A0=0A> Perhaps if we were all 100 hour pilots, blind= ly following the POH makes =0A>sense. It is funny, I remember having this E= XACT same argument on a Mooney =0A>board. I used to take off without flaps = when I had a Mooney and I heard the =0A>same thing there. Follow the POH ex= plicitly=C2=A0or you are completely=0Areckless =0A>and should have your lic= ense taken away. At least those Mooney guys had a =0A>point. That was a cer= tified aircraft with a POH that said to take off with =0A>flaps.=0A> =C2=A0= =0A> Something else to consider, if flaps are so critical to flight on our = =0A>planes, why on earth don't they have a back up system to ensure they al= ways =0A>go down when needed like our landing gear has? My guess is because= the=0Aplane =0A>will fly just fine without them.=0A> =C2=A0=0A> Matt=0A> = =0A> =0A> ________________________________=0A> From: Art Jensen =0A> To: lml@lancaironline.net =0A> Sent: Monday, August 12, 20= 13 1:46 PM=0A> Subject: [LML] Re: To Marv=0A>=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A> Maybe Wolfgan= g was short on political correctness, but the truth remains =0A>that if you= cannot or do not fly the plane as it was meant to be flown then =0A>you sh= ould not be flying that plane. =0A> =0A> I believe everyone would agree tha= t flaps do add a margin of safety and =0A>should be used for take-off and l= anding as per your POH and I believe every =0A>instructor giving training i= n a Lancair would agree.=C2=A0=C2=A0If an=0Ainstructor =0A>reading this dis= agrees, please share why you disagree with me.=0A> =0A> Art=0A> =0A> Sent f= rom Yahoo! Mail for iPad=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A> =0A> =0A> ________________________= ________=0A> From:=C2=A0=C2=A0steve ;=C2=A0=C2=A0To:=C2=A0= =C2=A0;=C2=A0=C2=A0Subject: =0A> [LML] Re: To Marv= =C2=A0=C2=A0Sent:=C2=A0=C2=A0Mon, Aug 12, 2013 5:39:28=0APM=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=0A> I second your post. I am surprised by the comment. =0A> =0A> = steve alderman=C2=A0=C2=A0 N25SA=C2=A0 360 =0A> =0A> . =0A> -----Original M= essage----- From: Claudette Colwell =0A>To: lml =0ASent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013 5:43 am Subject: =0A>[LML] To= Marv=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A> It is very regretful the comment from Wolfgang appare= ntly directed to Matt =0A>appeared on the LML.=C2=A0 This has always been a= constructive exchange of =0A>information and ideas.=C2=A0 That type of per= sonal comment is not in=0Akeeping with =0A>the spirit of cooperative sharin= g of information. =0A> =C2=A0 =0A> Claudette=C2=A0=C2=A0 =0A--=0A=C2=A0=0A= For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html= ---1977980688-782147457-1376675013=:51686 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill,
That brings up a interesting topic:  Carb Heat. 
Long ago wh= en rigging up carb heat on my= 360, I measured the temperature rise offered up by our tiny 320/360&n= bsp;heat muffs.  Lycoming wanted to see a 75 degrees rise.  I was measuring nowhere close to t= hat.  I re-plumbed to pull carb= heat air from under the engine so that I could utilize engine heat = plus the heat muff.  Now I had something useful.
At the same time I tried to find N= TSB reports with carb = icing as a cause.  I came up empty for Ly= comings.  It appeared they were more immune.  The carb is bolted to a very large heat s= ource - the oil sump.  So once the oil is warm it seemed to offer up s= ome protection. 
Lycoming is most concerned about carb ice at part power operation.  I have a TC = in my carb and monitored tem= peratures during part power.  They actually went up.  -makes sens= e.  Less air to counter the heat coming in from the sump.
=
Operationally I do not operate at part power in humid conditions= until after the oil has reached normal operating temperatures.  In ot= her words, if I am going out to practice instruments approaches in our loca= l fog, I spend a few minutes burning avgas at high power first.
I am curious if anyo= ne on the list has experienced carb= ice in a Lycoming an= d what the circumstances were surrounding the event.  I have never act= ually needed carb heat but I= feel better knowing it is there.
 
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std

From: Bill Bradburry <bbradburry@bellsouth.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
= Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013= 5:00 AM
Subject: [LML= ] Re: Flaps on take-off?
=
=0A=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
My next = door hangar mate was practicing=0AI= LS approaches at night and forgot to put on carb heat.  He wound up in an=0Aorange grove.&= nbsp; Destroyed his RV-6 but no one injured.
=0A=0A &= nbsp;
=0A=0A
B2
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
From:=0A Lancair Mailing List [mail= to:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf O= f Jim Nordin
= =0ASent: Thursday, August = 15, 2013=0A9:39 PM
=0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net
=0ASubjec= t: [LML] Flaps on take-off?
=0A=0A
=0A= =0A
 
=0A=0A=
I know ho= w an engine fails in the close=0Apattern environment. Decent from altitude = and forget to richen the eng= ine.=0AHappened to a friend while I was in the plane (ES) as copilot. Why d= id it=0Ahappen? His wife normally is co-pilot and I didn=E2=80=99t prompt him with the=0Averbal clues h= e needed. Very close to touch down it just quit. No problem as we=0Awere on= ly 100=C2=B1 feet above the ground and nearly at the numbers. Scary=0Anonet= heless =E2=80=93 mostly after everything was on the ground and rolling out= =0Asafely. He didn=E2=80=99t= waver from the task of landing - engine or no.
=0A=0A<= div class=3D"yiv3972751426MsoNormal">Jim=
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
From:=0A Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironli= ne.net] On Behalf Of Lanca= ir-ESP
=0ASent: Thursda= y, August 15, 2013=0A5:25 PM
=0ATo= : lml@lancaironline.net
=0ASubject: [LML] Re: F= W: [LML] Flaps=0Aon take-off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=
 
=0A=0ABill,
=0A=0A
 = ;
=0A=0A
What you describe is=0Acert= ainly a possible scenario =E2=80=93 actually that sounds like my typical=0A= arrival.  With the engine pulled back to 10-12=E2=80=9D and a windmill= ing=0Aprop the decent rate should be similar zero power and a feathered pro= p.  
=0A=0A
<= font color=3D"#1f497d" face=3D"Calibri" size=3D"2"> 
=0A=0A
But how likely is an engine that fails in=0Athe close patt= ern after a cross-country flight?  More likely something would go afoul enroute, when the=0Apilot coul= d select a landing spot and arrive 2000 ft above it.  If not=0Aable to= arrive 2000 ft agl =E2=80= =93 choose an alternate spot.
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Just my couple lira= =0A. . .
=0A=0A
<= font color=3D"#1f497d" face=3D"Calibri" size=3D"2"> 
=0A=0A
Robert
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0AFrom:= Bill Bradburry=0A[mailto:bbradburry@bellsouth.net]
=0ASent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013=0A2:06 = PM
=0ATo: lml@lancairon= line.net
=0ASubject: RE= : [LML] FW: [LML] Flaps=0Aon= take-off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Robert,
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
You should try it under= conditions that are=0Amore likely to be the case.  =0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Descend to pattern altitude, 10= 00 ft AGL,=0Aslow to pattern= speed, and idle the engine abeam the numbers and see if you can=0Amake it<= /span>
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
I recommend yo= u idle the engine and not=0Akill it, because I would be surprised if you do= make it.  I also=0Adon=E2=80=99t recommend you coarse pitch the prop = since you may need to add power=0Afor the go around.
= =0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Bill
=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
From:=0A Lancair Mailing= List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.n= et] On Behalf Of Lanca= ir-ESP
=0ASent: Wednesd= ay, August 14, 2013=0A11:18 AM
=0A= To: lml@lancaironline.= net
=0ASubject: [LM= L] FW: [LML] Flaps on=0Atake= -off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Bill,
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
I practiced that=0Amaneuver with a Lancair company pilot fly= ing my ES-P and found it a non-event. =0A
=0A=0AOverhead upwind at=0A2000 ft agl and slowing to pattern speed in the turn.
=0A=0A
No flaps until over=0Athe fence then de= ployed everything and aimed for 1/3 down the runway.  =0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
I realize the IV=0Awould take different speeds but it should st= ill be do-able with a little=0Apractice.
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
Robert
=0A=0A
ES-P N301ES
= =0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
From: Bill Bradburry [mailto:bbradburry@bellsouth.net]
=0ASent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013=0A9:26 AM
=0ATo:
lml@lancaironline.net
=0ASubject: RE: [LML] Flaps on=0Atake-off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
That seems a scenario where you would b= e=0Ain better shape with the flaps up.  You very well might make the= =0Arunway.  With flaps down, you likely would not and it would be very= =0Adangerous to try and retract them.  With the high wing loading that= all=0Athe Lancairs have, th= ey are flying bricks with no power.  I think almost=0Anobody makes the= approach to land with no power.
=0A=0A
Remember way ba= ck in primary training when=0Athe instructor had you remove power abeam the= numbers and make the landing=0Awithout having to add power?  Does any= one practice that maneuver with=0Atheir Lancair?
=0A=0A=
 
=0A=0A
Bill B
=0A=0A
 =
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
From:=0A Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Bill Hannah= an
=0ASent: Tues= day, August 13, 2013=0A6:33 AM
=0A= To: lml@lancaironline.= net
=0ASubject: [LM= L] Flaps on take-off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A= =0A
Matt, I=0Aagree with the others that w's insults are inexcusable, bu= t I must ask a=0Aquestion.
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A= =0A
&nbs= p;
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
What do you do if your low ove= r the=0Adeparture end of the runway and the engine quits? =0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
= =0A=0A
1= .  Land at high speed flaps up.
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
2.   Lower = the flaps and deal=0Awith the big trim and pitch change while making all th= e other decisions and=0Aactions required in parallel.
= =0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A= =0A
3.&n= bsp;  ?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=
Regards,
=0A=0A
= =0A=0A
=0A=0A
Bill=0AHannahan
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=
=0A=0A =0A=0A
=0A= =0A
=0A=0A
 
= =0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
--= ---=0AForwarded Message -----
=0A
From: "marv@lancair.net= "=0A<marv@lancair.net>
=0A= To: lml <lml>
= =0ASent: Monday, August 12= , 2013 4:02=0APM
=0ASubject: [LML] Re: Flaps on=0Atake-off?
=0A=0A
=0A=0A=
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
= =0A=0A

=0A
=0A=0APosted for Matt losangeles <mattinlosangele= s@yahoo.com>:
=0A
=0A> I feel much safer adding 5 knots or = so on the ground before I lift off so=0AI
=0A>don't have to mess wit= h trim when I am low to the ground. I could see a
=0A>scenario where= I take off IFR and I am imm= ediately handed off to departure
=0A>control while I am putting the = flaps up. They tell me to do something the
=0A>requires me to look a= t my map and the next thing you know, while=0Adistracted,
=0A> = I am at an unusual attitude really close to the ground. When I am=0Adown lo= w
=0A>like that I want to make sure if I am distracted it isn't a pr= oblem, the
=0A>plane just keeps on climbing along at Vy or so.
=0A>  
=0A> I al= so would guess if you use flaps on take off, this adds drag and=0Aslow= s
=0A>your rate of climb (I have not tested this). I am able to= be at Vy a=0Acouple
=0A= >seconds after take off and I am going to get to a safer altitude before= the=0A
=0A>guy using flaps (again, this is my guess since I have not= tested the two
=0A>scenarios).
=0A>  
=0A> Another= thing. It is an experimental aircraft. As it states on the
=0A>EAA
, "There is  n= o FAA approved flight manual or POH= =0Afor experimental
=0A>aircraft, nor is there a  T= C". 
=0A>  
=0A> Ohh, what about those r= eno =0Aracer Legacy aircraft that have just bonded thier
=0A>flaps in place so they can't= go down in order to eliminate the drag of the
=0A>hindges. I guess they are not flying those ai= rcraft the way they were meant=0A
=0A>to be flown. You could argue th= ey are reno =0Aracers I supp= ose. It is also
=0A>likely they are using those planes the other 51 = weeks out of the year to=0Afly
=0A>all over the place and those plan= es don't seem to be crashing on takeoff.
=0A>  
=0A> "I be= lieve everyone would agree that flaps do add a margin of=0Asafety"
=0A&g= t;  I personally consider myself part of everyone and I don't agree th= at=0Aflaps
=0A>do in fact add a margin of safety on take off. I use = them on landing so I=0Acan
=0A>see out the window and out of habit I= suppose. If the speed you land=0Aat makes
=0A>such a differenc= e, then the best thing to be doing is flying a plane that
=0A>lands = at a slower speed.
=0A>  
=0A> Perhaps if we were all 100 = hour pilots, blindly following the = POH makes
=0A>sense. It is funny, I remember having this EXAC= T same argument on a Mooney
=0A>board. I used to take off without fl= aps when I had a Mooney and I heard the=0A
=0A>same thing there. Foll= ow the POH explicitly o= r you are completely=0Areckless
=0A>and should have your license tak= en away. At least those Mooney guys had a
=0A>point. That was a cert= ified aircraft with a POH th= at said to take off with
=0A>flaps.
=0A>  
=0A> Som= ething else to consider, if flaps are so critical to flight on our
=0A&= gt;planes, why on earth don't they have a back up system to ensure they alw= ays=0A
=0A>go down when needed like our landing gear has? My guess is= because the=0Aplane
=0A>will fly just fine without them.
=0A>=  
=0A> Matt
=0A>
=0A>
=0A> ________________= ________________
=0A> From: Art Jensen <flycassutts@yahoo.com>
=0A> To: lml@lancaironline.net
=0A> Sent: Mon= day, August 12, 2013 1:46 PM
=0A> Subject: [LML] Re: To Marv
=0A&g= t;  
=0A> Maybe Wolfgang was short on political correctness= , but the truth remains
=0A>that if you cannot or do not fly the pla= ne as it was meant to be flown then=0A
=0A>you should not be flying t= hat plane.
=0A>
=0A> I believe everyone would agree that flap= s do add a margin of safety and
=0A>should be used for take-off and = landing as per your POH and = I believe every=0A
=0A>instructor giving training in a Lancair would = agree.  If an=0Ainstructor
=0A>reading this disagrees, ple= ase share why you disagree with me.
=0A>
=0A> Art
=0A> <= br>=0A> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad  
=0A>
=0A>
=0A> ______________= __________________
=0A> From:  steve <n5276j@aol.com= >;  To:  <lml@lancaironline.net>;  Subject:=0A
=0A> [LML] R= e: To Marv  Sent:  Mon, Aug 12, 2013 5:39:28=0APM =    
=0A> I second your post. I am surprised by the com= ment.
=0A>
=0A> steve= alderman   N25SA  360
=0A>
=0A> .
= =0A> -----Original Message----- From: Claudette Colwell <colwell.ch@gmail.com>
=0A>To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>=0ASent: Mon, Aug 12, 2013= 5:43 am Subject:
=0A>[LML] To Marv  
=0A> It is ver= y regretful the comment from Wolfgang apparently directed to Matt=0A
=0A= >appeared on the LML.  This has always been a constructive exchange= of
=0A>information and ideas.  That type of personal comment i= s not in=0Akeeping with
=0A>the spirit of cooperative sharing of inf= ormation.
=0A>  
=0A> Claudette  
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
--
 
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline=
.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A
=0A= =0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A
  ---1977980688-782147457-1376675013=:51686--