X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:27:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6024912 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:25:04 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.223.181; envelope-from=donkarich@gmail.com Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 16so13023831iea.12 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:24:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.91.169 with SMTP id cf9mr13853826igb.44.1358915069966; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:24:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.71.74 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:24:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.71.74 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:24:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:24:29 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: WPR13FA076 From: Don Karich X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9dad0677cc04d3ed1251 --e89a8f3b9dad0677cc04d3ed1251 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well skip the point you refer to is your destination.if your not vfr at this point then you'll need to extend your ifr flight plan before continuing in imc.if your vfr, then of course you may cancel your ifr clearance and proceed vfr On Jan 22, 2013 4:45 PM, "Skip Slater" wrote: > ** > Well Don, > Maybe you're the one who needs to check with a CFII because the IFR to > VFR on top clearance without a flight plan is very definitely legal. As > Ron Galbraith said, you are not cleared to a destination, you're cleared to > a point. I don't want to beat a dead horse here, but you're mistaken > because this is a common tool used in SoCal to deal with marine layers on > the coast. > I'm a 22,000 hour ATP and have been occasionally getting this type of > clearance for many, many moons now. If it weren't legal, I don't think > clearance would keep giving them to me. Try it some time - you'll get it. > I promise! > Skip > --e89a8f3b9dad0677cc04d3ed1251 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well skip the point you refer to is your destination.if your not vfr at = this point then you'll need to extend your ifr flight plan before conti= nuing in imc.if your vfr, then of course you may cancel your ifr clearance = and proceed vfr

On Jan 22, 2013 4:45 PM, "Skip Slater"= <skipslater@verizon.net&g= t; wrote:
Well Don,
=A0=A0 Maybe you're the one who needs to=20 check with a CFII because the IFR to VFR on top clearance without a flight = plan=20 is very definitely legal.=A0 As Ron Galbraith said, you are not cleared to = a=20 destination, you're cleared to a point.=A0 I don't want to beat a d= ead horse=20 here, but you're mistaken because this is a common tool used in SoCal t= o deal=20 with marine layers on the coast.
=A0=A0 I'm a 22,000 hour ATP and have been=20 occasionally getting this type of clearance for many, many moons now.=A0 If= =20 it weren't legal, I don't think clearance would keep giving them to= me.=A0=20 Try it some time - you'll get it.=A0 I promise!
=A0=A0 Skip
--e89a8f3b9dad0677cc04d3ed1251--