X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:27:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ye0-f175.google.com ([209.85.213.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6024837 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:20:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.213.175; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by mail-ye0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q7so1236857yen.6 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:19:42 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.236.152.104 with SMTP id c68mr27352935yhk.33.1358907582323; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:19:42 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pjdms-mbp.cfl.rr.com ([68.202.59.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d17sm9609122ann.11.2013.01.22.18.19.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:19:41 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Plenum only to Cylinder heads X-Original-Message-Id: <48CEB4B5-5BC4-41CC-9726-6214D1674A56@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:19:38 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) Thinking about all the air leaks that typically show up in the IO550 = Legacy cowl. A full size plenum has been accomplished by some folks. = What about a plenum that went from the inlet and simply exited onto the = three cylinder heads on that side? It would be smaller, maybe easier to = build, lighter. You could use a silicone seal where it would fit on = the barrel to keep a tight fit and wires could be kept away I believe. How much better would the cooling be and would the lack of air to the = rest of the crankcase or cylinder bases cause problems? Still need to = route some bleed to the accessories and oil cooler which we do already = but I'm talking about ducting the inlet straight to the head and = avoiding most of the leakage points and perhaps achieving better overall = cooling. Second: Why does the alternator duct exit below the engine? The exit = air may be warm but certainly less than CHT so why not duct the = alternator exit back into the upper deck and regain the pressure loss = that goes straight through the alternator and bypasses the cylinder = fins? Thoughts? Paul Legacy=