X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:27:55 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-6025335@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <donkarich@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ia0-f173.google.com ([209.85.210.173] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1)
  with ESMTPS id 6024915 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 23:27:01 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.173; envelope-from=donkarich@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ia0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l29so3764082iag.18
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:26:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.91.169 with SMTP id cf9mr13856968igb.44.1358915188280;
 Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.71.74 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.71.74 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:26:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <list-6024743@logan.com>
References: <list-6024743@logan.com>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:26:28 -0800
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAM5AQiqwLSVGvThf18ZV1=6Ze_oxLTE8TfyAg+3rMeRQ_oT7kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: WPR13FA076
From: Don Karich <donkarich@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9dad13cf4804d3ed19d4

--e89a8f3b9dad13cf4804d3ed19d4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

By the way i do operate in so cal and utilize this departure when it is
appropriate
On Jan 22, 2013 4:45 PM, "Skip Slater" <skipslater@verizon.net> wrote:

> **
> Well Don,
>    Maybe you're the one who needs to check with a CFII because the IFR to
> VFR on top clearance without a flight plan is very definitely legal.  As
> Ron Galbraith said, you are not cleared to a destination, you're cleared to
> a point.  I don't want to beat a dead horse here, but you're mistaken
> because this is a common tool used in SoCal to deal with marine layers on
> the coast.
>    I'm a 22,000 hour ATP and have been occasionally getting this type of
> clearance for many, many moons now.  If it weren't legal, I don't think
> clearance would keep giving them to me.  Try it some time - you'll get it.
> I promise!
>    Skip
>

--e89a8f3b9dad13cf4804d3ed19d4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p>By the way i do operate in so cal and utilize this departure when it is =
appropriate</p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jan 22, 2013 4:45 PM, &quot;Skip Slater&quot;=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:skipslater@verizon.net">skipslater@verizon.net</a>&g=
t; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<u></u>



<div style=3D"PADDING-LEFT:10px;PADDING-RIGHT:10px;PADDING-TOP:15px" name=
=3D"Compose message area">
<div><font face=3D"Arial">Well Don,</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">=A0=A0 Maybe you&#39;re the one who needs to=20
check with a CFII because the IFR to VFR on top clearance without a flight =
plan=20
is very definitely legal.=A0 As Ron Galbraith said, you are not cleared to =
a=20
destination, you&#39;re cleared to a point.=A0 I don&#39;t want to beat a d=
ead horse=20
here, but you&#39;re mistaken because this is a common tool used in SoCal t=
o deal=20
with marine layers on the coast.</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">=A0=A0 I&#39;m a 22,000 hour ATP and have been=20
occasionally getting this type of clearance for many, many moons now.=A0 If=
=20
it weren&#39;t legal, I don&#39;t think clearance would keep giving them to=
 me.=A0=20
Try it some time - you&#39;ll get it.=A0 I promise!</font></div>
<div><font face=3D"Arial">=A0=A0 Skip</font></div></div>
</blockquote></div>

--e89a8f3b9dad13cf4804d3ed19d4--