X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:44:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm18-vm0.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.170] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6024404 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:06:15 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.44.170; envelope-from=ralphlove@stanfordalumni.org Received: from [98.139.44.103] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2013 21:05:41 -0000 Received: from [98.138.84.214] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2013 21:05:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp103.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Jan 2013 21:05:41 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 224234.15143.bm@smtp103.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: b3K7Yz4VM1n_StxynimFVUjpMRsMXpu2GFCncDCtnJeL7tc 5QEd2n9koGzTQOqXiJ2sl2IQe_1so_7kosu0R7o9NxHj4Txpw1zSBtCDHQdu 73kVsVab2KOGK9bFhpJ1G.K8Qan0JiMYgFD20.QKJ1GnI6aRdANaKKGkMD5H yc9GEEMR425yYi_RP37v9ooZxQk_TKuQ0dNl1oN6ZAbZCyDjpW3TsFvM26UP 7eiAgd9IriL4KA1lUOaaSuijVrnmFQkKUxRRo3s_YfF6PBXkXGWEH1PLJvxJ wOMlvJpJfCP41tGqxdQf0kGewqF.To8hWOKiRgAdNGeUwPlosX2d3H1Li9IS 6Y7I2DqdgZH8jdh_hWdin04o4Y7hVHa5Wv3hQGvYxdFsPB4lZBu6KQUT.plA wgYz2iDAgHSQI9Klnv7C.JIECxDInL99BLD8glXhB0ml3ZG64jRNyCjyndCc qR5IRPgWYads3FFPVEZPidFxJFxVAxCBE X-Yahoo-SMTP: O0s9NnaswBCimploNHufwcJQi58B5NjMy.C2WAjfZjgmjJOd Received: from [10.0.1.5] (ralphlove@67.188.62.229 with plain) by smtp103.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2013 21:05:41 +0000 UTC Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IFR to VFR on top References: From: Ralph Love Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-9DD9F57E-885B-4E05-BB5E-F42549E49F7D X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:05:41 -0800 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-9DD9F57E-885B-4E05-BB5E-F42549E49F7D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This sounds like a semantics problem on how people interpret what a IFR clea= rance and a IFR flight plan is. I need a IFR clearance to fly a IFR flight plan. I don't need an IFR fligh= t plan (only an IFR clearance) to fly practice local approaches or IFR - VFR= on top from my experience. Pink Panther Ralph Love On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:25 PM, "Skip Slater" wrote: > Don, > You are correct- IFR to VFR on top definitely requires an instrument ra= ting. My point was that it does not require a flight plan. Sorry if there w= as any confusion on that. > Skip --Apple-Mail-9DD9F57E-885B-4E05-BB5E-F42549E49F7D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This sounds like a semantics problem on how people interpret what a IFR clearance and a IFR flight plan is.

I need a IFR clearance to fly a IFR flight plan. I don't need an IFR flight plan (only an IFR clearance) to fly practice local approaches or IFR - VFR on top from my experience.

Pink Panther

Ralph Love

On Jan 22, 2013, at 12:25 PM, "Skip Slater" <skipslater@verizon.net> wrote:

Don,

You are correct- IFR to VFR on top definitely requires an instrument rating. My point was that it does not require a flight plan. Sorry if there was any confusion on that.

Skip

--Apple-Mail-9DD9F57E-885B-4E05-BB5E-F42549E49F7D--