Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:44:23 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-6024730@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.161.171; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com
References: <list-6023535@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-6023535@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: WPR13FA076

Pretty normal procedure in the Pacific NW where skinny layers are common

John Barrett

Sent from my iPad


On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Paul Miller <pjdmiller@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep Skip, another waste of everyone's time and non-helpful response ("wron=
g").   The fact is I have done exactly the same thing, VFR Flight, needed an=
 IFR clearance to VFR conditions without a flight plan.  My last was in the L=
egacy at night with a layer on top of the destination airport.  I asked appr=
oach for a IFR descent clearance from 4000 to 2000 through the clouds, got i=
t, broke out and cancelled, landed VFR.  In the last 5 years I've found cont=
rollers extremely willing to be helpful to VFR pilots who ask for assistance=
.=20
>=20
> Paul
> Legacy
> On 2013-01-21, at 12:37 PM, "Skip Slater" <skipslater@verizon.net> wrote:
>=20
>> Possibly IFR to VFR on top, then cancel.  I've done that a couple of time=
s to take off from coastal airports with a marine layer that only extended a=
 few miles inland.  Don't need a flight plan to do that.
>>=20
>> Skip Slater=20
>>=20
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht=
ml
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm=
l