X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 18:27:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com ([216.32.181.186] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6019160 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:19:19 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.32.181.186; envelope-from=henry@cptgroup.com Received: from mail228-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.227) by CH1EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.43.70.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:45 +0000 Received: from mail228-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail228-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E938C00DA for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.213;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BL2PRD0711HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -17 X-BigFish: PS-17(zz9371I14e4M542I14e3Mb73dMzz1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275ch17326ahz2fh2a8h668h839h947hd25hf0ah1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h1155h) Received-SPF: pass (mail228-ch1: domain of cptgroup.com designates 157.56.240.213 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.213; envelope-from=henry@cptgroup.com; helo=BL2PRD0711HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ;.outlook.com ; Received: from mail228-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail228-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1358551107302826_23088; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from CH1EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (snatpool2.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.237]) by mail228-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E15C20096 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BL2PRD0711HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.213) by CH1EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.43.70.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:27 +0000 Received: from BL2PRD0711MB423.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.208]) by BL2PRD0711HT003.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.104.166]) with mapi id 14.16.0257.004; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:26 +0000 From: Henry Arjad X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: [LML] RPM on IO550N Thread-Topic: [LML] RPM on IO550N Thread-Index: AQHN9bcHbwT0+EJxPEqJsdswogWgSZhPr31A Disposition-Notification-To: Henry Arjad X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 23:18:25 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <558530A6DC7BEC45A373219ADBF87C6B11F9EEE3@BL2PRD0711MB423.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [209.80.5.75] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Return-Path: henry@cptgroup.com X-OriginatorOrg: cptgroup.com Berni, I had the same experience few months back with my Legacy. For no reason at= all, I started seeing strange and erratic rpm readings on my Dynon system.= It was obvious that the engine was fine, i.e. no over speed or change in = power experienced. The problem gradually got worse as we conducted flight = tests and tried to find the cause. During one of my test flights, without = any warning, the rpm stabilized and started functioning properly. After la= nding and visual inspection, I decided to go for another flight to see what= I would find out. During the run-up, the magneto test failed. The magnet= o had less than 100 hours on it after the 500 hours inspection/repair. The= magneto was removed and sent to the shop for further evaluation. The repa= ir shop called me and said that the magneto had check out ok with no proble= ms. I was adamant about the magneto having failed during run-up and asked = him to heat the unit while testing. I received a call from the shop shortl= y that the magneto had indeed failed after having it heated up. It was det= ermined that the coil was the problem and it was replaced and the unit was = installed in the airplane and has been working just fine ever since. =20 That was my experience with a similar problem. I hope this helps. =A0 Henry Arjad=20 N22YY KSNA =20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Bern= i Breen Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 12:04 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] RPM on IO550N I just started experiencing widely varying RPM read outs on all 3 of the ga= uges of my Lancair Legacy. During run up and subsequent take off my MFD, P= FD and EIS all show correct RPM read outs. Not until I get into cruise and= set the prop to 2400 do I see the problem. I slowly begin to see all 3 of= the read outs start to show a 2300 to 2600 (or there abouts) variance. Al= l 3 gauges are in sync and agreement on the numbers. In other words, they = all 3 read the same thing and the variance is very rapid up and down. Sinc= e I have already concluded that the prop governor is functioning properly a= nd I do not feel or hear a prop pitch change during these occurrences, I am= all but 100% sure I have some sort of erroneous information being sent to = my "glass" and therefore erroneous readings. As such I believe I need to c= heck all of the wiring and or "pick ups" between the engine and my MFD, PFD= and EIS. My problem is that I am not familiar with any of that. Can some= one reading this please help me get started by suggesting where I should lo= ok for the source of where my equipment gets the RPM information from the I= O550 (location of pick up)? Further, any kind of procedure to track down w= here or what my problem might be would be most appreciated. BTW, my read outs are on my GRT HX MFD and PFD as well as my VP200. I know= these units are displaying what they believe to be accurate information as= everything else is functioning flawlessly. I removed my prop governor, se= nt it for overhaul and it checked out perfect. Sent from my iPad Berni Breen Bbreen@cableone.net -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html