X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:56:20 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm26-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.236.225] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6013947 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:48:33 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.236.225; envelope-from=sdfields68@att.net Received: from [66.94.237.192] by nm26.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jan 2013 20:47:58 -0000 Received: from [68.142.198.206] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jan 2013 20:47:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Jan 2013 20:47:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 101512.84647.bm@smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: mBTp8HIVM1kinHJn04sUvaMvOPTAzxHa_asvVBFbEkAvi6e uACwgxPwFz94f5yhEaV8aAzfnAKmEl9EXJnDF42mXc5MgeVo9TahpCm0uv_y 8J2vJOFmB7iFty6IaBWaOhXJG1wZl1oDxraDcLZ_57VZd1ZM1DWfLAQNhXht KhJnYurWSnP0XG03doQ7dVeLieYXDEpvZx9YT3v04mhbaJ8aKtigVoed_.xA exGqEbGrpg1kClk6g8PzHRnGa_qRMlkJRHOL18VGztV2HifOpDaLHhxUBIyR LAvPNkS3X8cxd9CndHK09TRV.q0.xyF7EEhA2Fs8vzgPRchvSI3j..xktBrC xcXzzwOm1bkxwXOAWkt_yERg7Qkbv7NUe12rTcSbyQK4OYoX5c9Tef8o0K6c xmS6JekaCFCst8sdV8zR4XfQf2Nlf.OntAkBHsoGBloN8zbrh X-Yahoo-SMTP: oOs2YV.swBD88T6A.ZRi5opgiddpIVJ9zKnfW4KnPw-- Received: from Study (sdfields68@108.232.180.51 with login) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2013 12:47:57 -0800 PST From: "Stan Fields" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Routing Control Stick Cable X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:47:59 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <004501cdf361$9b11ba60$d1352f20$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01CDF32F.50774A60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Ac3zHkz/aMQidFRkTVqpN4TaEvtYyQAQzS+g Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CDF32F.50774A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That is the goal but what is the best/right way to do that? Stan From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Charles Brown Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:46 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Routing Control Stick Cable Dunno how that's possible. I thought the trick was to route the cable so that the flexure could as much as possible be spread over its length with very minor bending, rather than a lot of bending at any one point. Charley Brown Legacy #299 On Jan 14, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Stan Fields wrote: How do I route the Infinity Cables on my Legacy so that the control stick movement doesn't constantly flex the cable? There must be a simple answer that's eluding me. Stan ------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CDF32F.50774A60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That is the goal but what is the best/right way to do = that?

Stan

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Charles Brown
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:46 = AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: = Routing Control Stick Cable

Dunno = how that's possible. I thought the trick was to route the cable so = that the flexure could as much as possible be spread over its length = with very minor bending, rather than a lot of bending at any one = point.

Charley Brown

Legacy #299

On = Jan 14, 2013, at 4:37 PM, Stan Fields wrote:

How do I = route the Infinity Cables on my Legacy so that the control stick = movement doesn't constantly flex the cable? There must be a simple = answer that's eluding me.=

Stan

------=_NextPart_000_0046_01CDF32F.50774A60--