X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:57:00 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6013703 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:30:17 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.97; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.11]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 24B083800012A for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:29:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mtc005c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mtc005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.235.17]) by mtaomg-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id C95C6E000082 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:29:41 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com Full-name: Sky2high X-Original-Message-ID: <51776.26b30bce.3e26fa15@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:29:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [LML] Nasal canula, 18,000 feet, and the FARs X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_51776.26b30bce.3e26fa15_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 168 X-Originating-IP: [67.175.156.123] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:445601888:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d290b50f5a0151420 --part1_51776.26b30bce.3e26fa15_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit See far 91.211 Grayhawk In a message dated 1/15/2013 12:22:36 P.M. Central Standard Time, to m@lachollatech.com writes: These comments are about the law, not what is smart. WRT the 18,000 foot limit for using a nasal canula, the only rule I can find that says a mask is required above 18,000 feet is FAR 23.1447. Part 23 does not apply to aircraft with experimental certificates, see 23.1. So, legally, it seems, you can use a canula anytime. Does anyone know another regulation, that applies to experimental A/C, and requires a mask above 18,000 feet? If you do, please give the reference. Again, the question is what is legal, not what is smart. Tom Thibault L360, 1,000+ hours -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_51776.26b30bce.3e26fa15_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

See far 91.211

Grayhawk

In a message dated 1/15/2013 12:22:36 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 tom@lachollatech.com writes:

=
These comments are about the law, not what is smart.
=
WRT=20 the 18,000 foot limit for using a nasal canula, the only rule I can find = that=20 says a mask is required above 18,000 feet is FAR 23.1447. Part 23 d= oes=20 not apply to aircraft with experimental certificates, see 23.1. So,= =20 legally, it seems, you can use a canula anytime.

Does anyone know= =20 another regulation, that applies to experimental A/C, and requires a mask= =20 above 18,000 feet? If you do, please give the reference.

Aga= in,=20 the question is what is legal, not what is smart.

Tom Thibault
= L360,=20 1,000+ hours

--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html<= /DIV> --part1_51776.26b30bce.3e26fa15_boundary--