X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 17:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTPS id 6009646 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 03:22:20 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.41; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id bj3so1708565pad.14 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:21:44 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.192.66 with SMTP id he2mr242751346pbc.112.1358065304862; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:21:44 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.144] (c-66-235-58-245.sea.wa.customer.broadstripe.net. [66.235.58.245]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qw8sm5989124pbc.39.2013.01.13.00.21.43 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:21:44 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-FD45630E-E1B0-4534-808C-D696648F217B X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10A523) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP - pressurization X-Original-Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 00:21:44 -0800 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-FD45630E-E1B0-4534-808C-D696648F217B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for the responses. I have the posting that Jeff Leigner made a few y= ears ago and have been planning to follow this. For the Pro Seal recommendation over silicone, that's new for me. I see the= stuff at Aircraft Spruce for about $20. This gets 3.5 oz of the stuff. Do= es anyone have an idea of how much it takes to do a IV P with Pro seal? John Sent from my iPad On Jan 12, 2013, at 11:28 PM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote: > John, >=20 > Proseal is a much better sealant. >=20 > Jeff >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: John Barrett > To: lml > Sent: Sat, Jan 12, 2013 12:18 pm > Subject: [LML] IVP - pressurization >=20 > Hello All, > =20 > For those with IVPs I am ready to slather the insides of my airplane with= silicone for sealing up the pressure vessel and am hoping for input on best= practices, pitfalls etc. Better yet, if there is someone in the Puget Soun= d area who has done this themselves and felt good about it, I=E2=80=99d glad= ly fly you to the Olympic Peninsula, provide lunch, donate a couple of my ch= ildren to you etc, for hands on workshop. > =20 > I have all the panels fabricated and fit =E2=80=93 Jeffco Tank Sealed and r= eady to go --- I think. > =20 > Regards, > =20 > John Barrett, CEO > Leading Edge Composites > PO Box 428 > Port Hadlock, WA 98339 > =20 > www.carbinge.com > =20 --Apple-Mail-FD45630E-E1B0-4534-808C-D696648F217B Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the responses.  I have= the posting that Jeff Leigner made a few years ago and have been planning t= o follow this.

For the Pro Seal recommendation over= silicone, that's new for me.  I see the stuff at Aircraft Spruce for a= bout $20.  This gets 3.5 oz of the stuff.  Does anyone have an ide= a of how much it takes to do a IV P with Pro seal?

= John

Sent from my iPad


On Jan 12,= 2013, at 11:28 PM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote:

John,

Proseal is a much better sealant.

Jeff


-----O= riginal Message-----
From: John Barrett <jbarrett@car= binge.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sat, Jan 12, 2013 12:18 pm
Subject: [LML] IVP - pressurization
= --Apple-Mail-FD45630E-E1B0-4534-808C-D696648F217B--