X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:28:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.1) with ESMTP id 6009329 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:55:35 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.97; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.72]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 58918380000E2 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:54:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from core-mnc004c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mnc004.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.106.205]) by mtaomg-mb01.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 0ABCFE000086 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:54:54 -0500 (EST) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] IVP - pressurization In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CFBF2696A15484_2294_3C1A2_webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37288-STANDARD Received: from 12.110.229.82 by webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com (205.188.103.147) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:54:53 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CFBF26969A3061-2294-12283@webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [12.110.229.82] X-Original-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:54:53 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:471615904:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294850f1dbae4038 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CFBF2696A15484_2294_3C1A2_webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" John, Proseal is a much better sealant. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: John Barrett To: lml Sent: Sat, Jan 12, 2013 12:18 pm Subject: [LML] IVP - pressurization Hello All, =20 For those with IVPs I am ready to slather the insides of my airplane with = silicone for sealing up the pressure vessel and am hoping for input on best= practices, pitfalls etc. Better yet, if there is someone in the Puget Sou= nd area who has done this themselves and felt good about it, I=E2=80=99d gl= adly fly you to the Olympic Peninsula, provide lunch, donate a couple of my= children to you etc, for hands on workshop. =20 I have all the panels fabricated and fit =E2=80=93 Jeffco Tank Sealed and r= eady to go --- I think. =20 Regards, =20 John Barrett, CEO Leading Edge Composites PO Box 428 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 =20 www.carbinge.com =20 =20 ----------MB_8CFBF2696A15484_2294_3C1A2_webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" John,

Proseal is a much better sealant.

Jeff


-----= Original Message-----
From: John Barrett <jbarrett@carbinge.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sat, Jan 12, 2013 12:18 pm
Subject: [LML] IVP - pressurization

Hello All,
 
For those with IVPs  I am ready to slather th= e insides of my airplane with silicone for sealing up the pressure vessel a= nd am hoping for input on best practices, pitfalls etc.  Better yet, i= f there is someone in the Puget Sound area who has done this themselves and= felt good about it, I=E2=80=99d gladly fly you to the Olympic Peninsula, p= rovide lunch, donate a couple of my children to you etc, for hands on works= hop.
 
I have all the panels fabricated and fit =E2=80=93= Jeffco Tank Sealed and ready to go  --- I think.
 
Regards,
 
John Barrett, CEO
Leading Edge Composites
PO Box 428
Port Hadlock, WA 98339
 
 
----------MB_8CFBF2696A15484_2294_3C1A2_webmailstg-d01.sysops.aol.com--