X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [97.79.27.115] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by lancaironline.net (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 6.0.1) with HTTP id 6009287 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:34:40 -0500 From: Subject: Re: [LML] LML roots To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v6.0.1 Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 16:34:40 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Posted for Paul Miller <pjdmiller@gmail.com>:

Always a coin toss between volume of postings with wide topics and harsh
moderation and no traffic.   Of course the moderator has great ability to
steer and has been very good at keeping things moving as we don't have spam,
cursing, personal attacks and so forth that many sites have.  We're lucky
here.  

What I would like to see is perhaps a small change whereby longtime trusted
authors can immediately respond and not be filtered.  Newbies or untested
authors can still be moderated.  This would allow a more immediate response in
cases where someone needs help in a timely manner and the moderator may not
necessarily be hovering over the keyboard 24h per day.  That would be a small
but valuable adjustment that would not affect content, just speed of the post
and the replies.

[I'll do as you suggest and grant a small group of LML'ers unmoderated status.  We'll see how it goes for awhile and I'll think about expanding the program.  <marv>]

best in 2013 (btw, I did not know anything about gross weights in the earlier
Lancairs).

Paul
Legacy
Spruce Creek
On 2013-01-12, at 7:40 AM, "Greenbacks, UnLtd." <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

> I for one, would like to see LML return to its roots because in my
>experience, it's been adrift for a while.