Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #63915
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LML roots
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 13:17:48 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Angier,
 
Opinion: One of the best O2 systems is that of Mountain High, http://www.mhoxygen.com/ . 
 
Fact: The pulse demand controller only provides O2 when you inhale - thus uses much less O2 than a continuous flow system.  O2 outlets can be panel mounted.
 
Experience: I use an 8.7 cu ft aluminum tank mounted behind the pilot seat and the pulse demand system to a comfortable cannula.  While the controller is battery powered, I also provide it with ship's power. The tank size matches the aircraft size but provides hours of O2.  Like the military, if the planned flight is above 10,000 MSL, the tank is turned on before take off and the controller is set to deliver O2 above 5,000 MSL.  Trips to the Factory Lancair fly-ins in Oregon always required O2 since flights over the mountains and typical September forest fire smoke had some trip legs at or above 16,000 MSL. 
 
Attempt at humor: I provide a dummy cannula to the passenger.  Lacking the screams of terror from a sleeping co-pilot makes for a peaceful flight...  
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 1/12/2013 6:40:56 A.M. Central Standard Time, N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET writes:
I for one, would like to see LML return to its roots because in my experience, it's been adrift for a while. In other words, discussion of building techniques and problem solving and best building practices generally as they apply to our Lancairs. As well as interspersed with discussion of
how to safely and responsibly fly what a lot of us put together in our basements over many years. How about the topic of approach to stalls and spin avoidance. Gee, we haven't heard much on this subject in quite a while. :-) How about portable oxygen solutions, is there a clear winner out there? I plan to test the upper end of the altitude envelope in my 360 this year so I need to know.
And as for pre purchase advise for a 235/320/360, do your homework and go get a ride or 2 or 3 or more. Is there anyone left out there who does not know that the 235 gross weight was increased to 1500 lbs over 14yrs ago?
Oh, and here's a suggestion that may send a few people running for the hills, opinions may be interesting but really ought to be backed up by fact.


Cheers,

Angier Ames
N4ZQ
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster