X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:09:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s12.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.87] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c1) with ESMTP id 5676416 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:19:20 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.87; envelope-from=frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP252 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s12.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:18:44 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [121.219.165.102] X-Originating-Email: [frederickmoreno@bigpond.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from Razzle ([121.219.165.102]) by BLU0-SMTP252.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 19:18:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 10:18:24 +0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; charset="iso-8859-1"; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_OE2P4VA4G6G000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (6295203) From: Frederick Moreno References: X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail (lml@lancaironline.net)" Subject: New Turbine Engine - want HP and efficiency for your IVP? X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jul 2012 02:18:42.0927 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFEDDFF0:01CD6A0B] --------------Boundary-00=_OE2P4VA4G6G000000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Have a look at this=0D =0D http://www.red-aircraft.com/projects/flight-tests/=0D =0D And these specs:=0D =0D http://www.red-aircraft.com/engines/red-a03-v12/ Best efficiency is abou= t 0 344 lbs/hp hour at 400 hp.=0D =0D A quick set of calculations show that 400 HP would burn about 21 gph of = jet fuel and yield about 322 knots compared to TSIO 550 at 75% that started a= t 280 knots. =0D =0D Ready to flip out your checkbook??=0D =0D Fred=0D =0D =0D =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D =0D With this kind of engine in the pipeline,=0D http://www.aopa.org/oshkosh/2012/news/120723cessna-unveils-turbodiesel-18= 2 html=0D 240HP turbines sucking 28-32 gph are going to have a marketing problem.=0D =0D Wolfgang=0D =0D =0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_OE2P4VA4G6G000000000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Have a look at this
 
 
And these specs:
 
http://= www.red-aircraft.com/engines/red-a03-v12/  Best efficiency is ab= out 0.344 lbs/hp hour at 400 hp.
 
A quick set of calculations show that 400 HP would burn about  = 21 gph of jet fuel and yield about 322 knots compared to TSIO 550 at 75% = that started at 280 knots. 
 
Ready to flip out your checkbook??
 
Fred
 
 
 
 
-= ------Original Message-------
 
 
With this kind of engine in the pipeline,
240HP turbines sucking 28-32 gph are going to have a marketing probl= em.
 
Wolfgang
 
--------------Boundary-00=_OE2P4VA4G6G000000000--