|
Correction . . . that's 10 gallons per hour
more than an equivalent piston.
Wolfgang
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2012 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [LML] RE: New turbine engine?
Nice that there are still small turbines being
developed but sucking up $10 more per hour than an equivalent piston is not my
idea of "better".
Wolfgang
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:33
AM
Subject: [LML] RE: New turbine
engine?
Thanks,
Marv! <grin>
Posted for
"Gary Fitzgerald" <gbfitz@swbell.net>:
You'd
think SOMEONE on this list would have said something about the TP
100
turbine engine Diemech Turbines is showing on their web site by
now.
(drumming fingers on the table.)
[Please,
stop drumming your fingers.....
Attached are the brochure and a fuel
burn document for the TP100. Please, by all means, stop by the Diemech
booth at Oshkosh, visit Chris, and see the TP100 installation being
implemented on the company RV10. It's a pretty amazing machine... 241
shp out of a 125 pound package. Lots of possibilities there. Feel free
to contact me for additional information. <Marv>
]
|