X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:30:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with ESMTPS id 5655958 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:28:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.52; envelope-from=pjdmiller@gmail.com Received: by pbbro8 with SMTP id ro8so1145178pbb.25 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.231.132 with SMTP id tg4mr7614212pbc.159.1342542456201; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:27:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.15.4] (S01060017ee00b6c0.cg.shawcable.net. [174.0.115.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jz4sm14320466pbc.17.2012.07.17.09.27.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Experimental TCAS system? References: From: Paul Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 10:27:33 -0600 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) If I have ads-b in only and my traffic is waas positioned, then why is this n= ot accurate? If I don't broadcast then the other traffic may not see me in n= on-radar areas but I don't see how that decreases the accuracy of my own tra= ffic info on my ship. Please explain. Paul On 2012-07-17, at 9:51, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: > it is not going to be accurate for you since you have not broadcast your o= wn information (ADS-B Out