Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #60496
From: Frederick Moreno <frederickmoreno@bigpond.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: MGL back up instrumentr
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 09:30:00 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Hi John:
 
I had the same problem with an altimeter, new out of the box, but I had it in storage for eight years.  Off to the shop where I learned that this is a common problem.  The sealant around the glass cracks.  This is the most common cause of a flunked static system test. 
 
Solution: clear nail polish around the perimeter of the glass.  Wicks into the crack, but is reasonably tough and flexible, works fine.  Expect to reapply every few years, particularly if the cockpit is thermally cycled a lot due to bigger day/night temperature swings wherever the airplane is stored.  
 
 
 
 
 
-------Original Message-------
 
Date: 16/12/2011 10:44:58 PM
Subject: MGL back up instrumentr
 

Infinity line MGL instruments – they are intriguing as back up gauges. 

 

Looks like the altimeter is Baro sensitive for input but needs electrons for output.  I spoke with Matt at their US distributor center and learned that it uses pitot static inputs to pressure sensors that generate output data for microprocessor to turn into altitude readout. 

 

Without electricity the gauge does not function, losing the microprocessing component as well as the LCD display output.  Does this mean that in order to have good backup one would need to have a totally  mechanical altimeter?

 

Have found that two of my cheap 2.25” gauges are failed with case leaks.  Have had them awhile but as far as I know they haven’t been mishandled.  I know the airspeed gauge is UMA.  I suspect the altimeter is the same  brand.  These are the  two failed instruments.

 

Advice welcome.

 

John Barrett

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

John Barrett, CEO

Leading Edge Composites

PO Box 428

Port Hadlock, WA 98339

 

www.carbinge.com

 

 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster