X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:36:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm21-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.220] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with SMTP id 5303547 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:05:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.220; envelope-from=mcmess1919@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.62] by nm21.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2011 23:04:53 -0000 Received: from [208.71.42.191] by tm2.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2011 23:04:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2011 23:04:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 630431.35968.bm@smtp202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: L9wSd_QVM1lUx5RZAVUBjvpZDOCrv6AOZo0C2Xry4EUcHWZ 2hTiP1IxC5AheNw8839c2._y7RhxL_.XDQ8UxmItMrnuGmjnyqfuWnGGnajN gpZWcyQ3KX5mHamU1uY8mmh6jDMJpBx5d_FX8aCyuwZHCYcDkPBb8hAI4Qrr edMPgCSxysIEABToDAp_7y2h1VMSZ6_2c27AdwT.DQTFQyO7uNbchrluvkac GsKC00pQ3ac_2h8edu5nz0MseDgek7axsQ77hk_O_CLsigRr4oP6DNCU7SaT TBMS1yCIBWqebDCP.DSY8cFNwFxvC_qkb2e.cn3bPJ1IJBUih2nvHfuaDRzd ib5_mUioTy1nlCmK_FbN3ZPO9hV.EyvAXXK_qbOwCGgjORHiAVrmCMSLTG7s Qls.gXmi_M1Tp_681yQL5uhJ6ePDdNWchXW5jsFkXxqUuivzJXck3GF1VKVz Q5gskyJAV7QkLgaIFabzb9T5cqw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: rK4i7HqswBC7mDE8.sOiWQeO4CeReXc- Received: from StevePC (mcmess1919@24.28.78.160 with login) by smtp202.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2011 15:04:51 -0800 PST From: "Steve Colwell" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Electronic Ignition System Application X-Original-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:04:52 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <00f901ccb9eb$9fa31520$dee93f60$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00FA_01CCB9B9.5508A520" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acy5u+k8cJyaPqBVR0ilSxv25LEvPgALb2gQ Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01CCB9B9.5508A520 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris and Scott, The Advanced Pilot Seminar suggests experimenting with carb heat to improve atomization and mixture distribution. Those of us old enough to have messed with carbureted cars and heat risers understand the theory. The trade off is expanding the mixture by heating it. Might help, might hurt. Steve Colwell Subject: [LML] Re: Electronic Ignition System Application Chris, Yes, part of the problem is induction/mixture differences caused by the throttle plate position. I.E. WOT may be a quite different distribution than at partial throttle. Uh, switch over to injection. Then you only have to deal with injector engine position locations resulting in differences in atomization of the fuel because of variable upper cowl air flow/pressure. Scott In a message dated 12/13/2011 9:01:14 A.M. Central Standard Time, chris_zavatson@yahoo.com writes: Scott, "....., not to mention the induction system limitations inherent carbureted engines." Now you're on to something.. I fear my not-so-ideal mixture distribution would the limiting factor even with EI. Chris Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std www.N91CZ.net ------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01CCB9B9.5508A520 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chris and = Scott,

<= /o:p>

The = Advanced Pilot Seminar suggests experimenting with carb heat to improve = atomization and mixture distribution. Those of us old enough to = have messed with carbureted cars and heat risers understand the = theory. The trade off is expanding the mixture by heating = it. Might help, might hurt.

<= /o:p>

Steve = Colwell

Subje= ct: [LML] Re: Electronic Ignition System = Application

C= hris,

&= nbsp;

Y= es, part of the problem is induction/mixture differences = caused by the throttle plate position. I.E. WOT may be = a quite different distribution than at partial = throttle.

&= nbsp;

U= h, switch over to injection. Then you only have to deal with = injector engine position locations resulting = in differences in atomization of the fuel because of variable upper = cowl air flow/pressure.

&= nbsp;

S= cott

&= nbsp;

I= n a message dated 12/13/2011 9:01:14 A.M. Central Standard Time, = chris_zavatson@yahoo.com writes:

<= p class=3DMsoNormal style=3D'background:white'>S= cott,
&= quot;....., not to mention the induction system limitations = inherent carbureted engines."
N= ow you're on to something..
I= fear my not-so-ideal mixture distribution would the limiting = factor even with EI.
C= hris
&= nbsp;
C= hris Zavatson
N= 91CZ
3= 60std
<= a href=3D"http://www.n91cz.net/" = title=3D"http://www.n91cz.net/">www.N91CZ.net
<= o:p>

------=_NextPart_000_00FA_01CCB9B9.5508A520--