X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:42:12 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.212] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with ESMTP id 5292874 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:51:52 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.27.212; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5XiL1i0090mlR8UAEXrAhG; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:51:10 +0000 Received: from [10.49.15.174] ([198.228.221.227]) by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5XlU1i0274uyw7a8XXlZ8k; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:45:42 +0000 References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-66D21374-F28C-426D-BEFE-2E19B213524A X-Original-Message-Id: <9AE78C14-4C40-47B1-87EA-7D55150EC068@comcast.net> X-Original-Cc: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: John Hafen Subject: Re: [LML] 3/8" or 1/2" Fuel Lines? X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:50:59 -0800 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-66D21374-F28C-426D-BEFE-2E19B213524A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Must have half inch flow.=20 John Hafen (Sent from mobile device therefore brief.) On Dec 5, 2011, at 11:38 AM, "Dan & Kari Olsen" wrote:= > LML Gang, > =20 > I=E2=80=99m building a piston IV-P and am near ready to close out the firs= t wing. The kit I have came with 3/8=E2=80=9D fittings for the fuel lines. = However, I seem to recall some of you changing that out for =C2=BD=E2=80=9D= lines and hose. > =20 > What is the wisdom on this? Is the standard 3/8=E2=80=9D sufficient or is= =C2=BD=E2=80=9D necessary? =C2=BD=E2=80=9D is certainly going to have less= losses but will also have more weight and will be more work and cost to swa= p out. > =20 > Dan Olsen --Apple-Mail-66D21374-F28C-426D-BEFE-2E19B213524A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Must have half inch flow.&= nbsp;

John Hafen
(Sent from mobile device therefore brief.)
=

On Dec 5, 2011, at 11:38 AM, "Dan & Kari Olsen" <olsen25@comcast.net> wrote:

=

LML Gang,

 

I=E2=80=99m building a piston IV-P and am near ready= to close out the first wing.  The kit I have came with 3/8=E2=80=9D fi= ttings for the fuel lines.  However, I seem to recall some of you chang= ing that out for =C2=BD=E2=80=9D lines and hose.

 

What is the wisdom on t= his?  Is the standard 3/8=E2=80=9D sufficient or is =C2=BD=E2=80=9D nec= essary?  =C2=BD=E2=80=9D is certainly going to have less losses but wil= l also have more weight and will be more work and cost to swap out.

 

Dan= Olsen

= --Apple-Mail-66D21374-F28C-426D-BEFE-2E19B213524A--