X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:42:12 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm8.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.44.135] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with SMTP id 5292891 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:00:00 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.44.135; envelope-from=bu131@swbell.net Received: from [98.139.44.103] by nm8.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2011 19:59:23 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.73] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2011 19:59:23 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Dec 2011 19:59:23 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 644580.97598.bm@omp1010.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68734 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Dec 2011 19:59:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=swbell.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3ytusKtXCJAk1EP4x2z0IWmj1cMLwp2tg60j9Nc1uh27qNYlE+9khnWMyNdjQ5pD0xCgyRAMa66k75J/fZoaZATVwudt9OGOBiKbHTUJE+6sE5Lm+vuuPtUftwlr9cbIovVEUtjdd2BC5xwIGxezRcQ+WqucrNlJxQa5n4oEE3k=; X-YMail-OSG: cJGEZZkVM1mRjH5TaKhsm0Or1W2p9wD5o2mY9fBSIuQ3aNR kX81rmQMwx2lmbFSQZeOy2KDbViELmh5irNecmKCqGQJaq10gq74yn.nlUvP lNViGB9G_iezuNa_.KWaVs_o4HNyXDSlZFfsperWAURWRlWsGQaraZ7JYm5H RNcqXWPnrpslWMFhF_Kn8fww4BIwysl3rWIcAIhPkMeSORJpwuUh3XMqWTNC fmcjayMuKNY89bmKJ1VUmtDUNoRD98yI0MWftUraFiXVSIJjAunhTImwgvNm 1j2LdPYk.9_FNAxhNi09Ggd3YioJP1wq5A_wSb8SEn8Hmk7z13R4KbZlPCtw _Hou644GiRTrThiCjOmdyBCXT0ww8WKzoq2WlXz1NRGTJ3.kJuU1WAqwA352 Hb0D6_iMmkEI3629VFXUYFTrLwql7xv7Ox9JVsKSajXWLiV5WIVEB7YBBNLt DQbUhr8Mh3NyY_441XboejjiL Received: from [70.254.83.98] by web80002.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:59:23 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/589 YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: X-Original-Message-ID: <1323115163.11002.YahooMailRC@web80002.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:59:23 -0800 (PST) From: Dr Andres Katz Subject: Re: [LML] 3/8" or 1/2" Fuel Lines? X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1479734731-1148400676-1323115163=:11002" ---1479734731-1148400676-1323115163=:11002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0Asmall lines do not provide enough fuel at high altitude=0Aover 20K th= e engine will quit when switching tanks=0Aunless you use high boost=0Ago ah= ead and use the large diameter lines to prevent that=0A=0AIV-P 500 hrs=0A= =0A________________________________=0AFrom: Dan & Kari Olsen =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0ASent: Mon, December 5, 2011 1:38:22 P= M=0ASubject: [LML] 3/8" or 1/2" Fuel Lines?=0A=0A=0ALML Gang,=0A=C2=A0=0AI= =E2=80=99m building a piston IV-P and am near ready to close out the first = wing.=C2=A0 The =0Akit I have came with 3/8=E2=80=9D fittings for the fuel = lines.=C2=A0 However, I seem to =0Arecall some of you changing that out for= =C2=BD=E2=80=9D lines and hose.=0A=C2=A0=0AWhat is the wisdom on this?=C2= =A0 Is the standard 3/8=E2=80=9D sufficient or is =C2=BD=E2=80=9D =0Anecess= ary?=C2=A0 =C2=BD=E2=80=9D is certainly going to have less losses but will = also have more =0Aweight and will be more work and cost to swap out.=0A=C2= =A0=0ADan Olsensmall lines at ---1479734731-1148400676-1323115163=:11002 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=0A

small lines do not provide = enough fuel at high altitude

=0A

over 20K the engine will q= uit when switching tanks

=0A

unless you use high boost=0A

go ahead and use the large diameter lines to prevent that=0A

IV-P 500 hrs

=0A

=0A

=0AFrom: Dan & Kari Olsen <olsen25@comcast.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, December 5, 2011 1:38:22 PM<= BR>Subject: [LML] 3/8" or 1= /2" Fuel Lines?

=0A=0A=0A

=0A

LML G= ang,

=0A

=0A

I=E2=80= =99m building a piston IV-P and am near ready to close out the first wing.&= nbsp; The kit I have came with 3/8=E2=80=9D fittings for the fuel lines.&nb= sp; However, I seem to recall some of you changing that out for =C2=BD=E2= =80=9D lines and hose.

=0A

=0A

What is the wisdom on this? Is the standard 3/8=E2=80=9D suf= ficient or is =C2=BD=E2=80=9D necessary? =C2=BD=E2=80=9D is certainly= going to have less losses but will also have more weight and will be more = work and cost to swap out.

=0A

=0A

Dan Olsen

small lines at

---1479734731-1148400676-1323115163=:11002--