X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:04:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.52.208] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with SMTP id 5178874 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:04:16 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.52.208; envelope-from=n20087@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.52.192] by nm11.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 01:03:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.172] by tm5.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 01:03:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1055.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 01:03:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 820052.80134.bm@omp1055.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 15585 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2011 01:03:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:References:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:Subject:Date:To; b=u91I44Y2QUQqIj0U6TS1NFZ/hIwuH5nZmnITN1rWc4MPJcO2+r42+vwIYOT3krGGWYr9deLeZf4sLO5wxkfMXnmsbe9n2yCcoX1JXXbYArjxodGuLpVh2bPDw+oek0yRyjoziWDhxcby2oiAX9jfqkMG6YK25PQ0xvE/UDm78Uc= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: nG6dVhMVM1mJKpezAMsoseny0hhmTt0l_XNsK0XZLB2jAWB nIMX9C6vRkxIaIgPQyfwzR_9CaNR0bFPaALkoTtr_uZXBafTDejiZJI60Rqa czs6XpJRXXhocDNZe4g.ekNkXNN990Na8V5ZSzD8ntIXA_82WWvcEyUzcMMn gYNuFIzwE63YMIBjBHVZdV41UUPJErmftBQWLY9Oewo5Tv7iTYPLo0owibLp hYXTxUyc5fhN2Swos7Ufn2Wq0XF6D1iyqJ.6ZgOg1aIjISEWcNF8lBCsAjGE 5dDKFejjFC9C_6zsYCo6k61LmqKiBdtgEpIMM3dYFOW6XrNU2oX_TvSWimWy 57BGTYrYo4p0e8UnItFgFdR581zlOoMq9fKgnXJUtwtwof1LjxZFwCeMMS5e RyzJhly_t X-Yahoo-SMTP: NQQt3c2swBAKSrExoA1eZuT7_w-- Received: from [192.168.1.100] (n20087@98.185.51.168 with xymcookie) by smtp107-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2011 18:03:42 -0700 PDT References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Message-Id: <4324C126-755C-4648-A029-F07B46A89B20@yahoo.com> X-Original-Cc: "" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A334) From: N20087 Subject: Lnc 2 tires X-Original-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 21:03:42 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Folks, I am running McCreary 5.00 5 tires on the mains of my 360 with outback gear.= They are 4 ply. My nose tire is a cheng11 400 5 4 ply. I want to replace= my mains soon due to wear. I see a good deal of dialogue in past posts th= at indicate people are using the smaller 11 400 5 Lambs on the mains. I have= had no issues with the larger McCreary tires but there is a significant pri= ce difference between the two. I would love to hear from others with experie= nce using the 11 400 5 lambs on an outback 360 and recommendations in favor o= f the larger tires=20 Sent from my iPad Thanks Tom=