X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm21-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.236.31] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with SMTP id 5109736 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:01:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.236.31; envelope-from=cwfmd@yahoo.com Received: from [66.94.237.197] by nm21.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.119] by tm8.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Aug 2011 19:01:21 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 464851.33092.bm@omp1024.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 34580 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Aug 2011 19:01:21 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ojTBnPwFLvOrDxhTGM50hjt/bgBtKjNUj7NRlGCKB5sPbhazmzc6u5i8ecCoNEARBSsSilz8SncOeSiOrZ9i7OHsE2O95HHBMlkGFkdHvgizYmLPL5y7GX/cZcCan5FDCfTVwXnOITSV+GOIGMvMdg1ybbucM5UtaIAP5lrKdNk=; X-YMail-OSG: _lb95sAVM1mvhgGVdUKGT5YO01PyeId8BfRO8cMvzy0d_y6 Eskm1b8KWjVEeJhS8XztyfP0VZpZcSamZMavVMiZdJVZN5dHIfk17pODYAGL zdig8g_2v3va8Y_CaJqQgr0a8NFj3Ppt4UpWRFE7nUqKfQ7.Zn_TORs0Ofsj UAufrXDu8GH4hh4axpyA0XUjyiqiRjI5VgrXqI1Y5cZbdifaEUCzzUhy5JT0 C8d7Ux1vQk.KRtWLhTBRQOrHBCTsNm89BFXKxxN3X4CuHIkgNp3KkEomNcFU cChwv.107X1.uMTQ7eLGMU02kPytJ0FPynPbbMprTAEBhq8nUkZfrjlrJgPH jRLgnOiPY3I9neMaLsDgqhpsQh69sLTLS5uylHPQ91pPm0PXVggzkKpWPZB2 IuckIq_UDquP16kTJzlVNZLOlyjq5N35P5oPFCjaQiHQ_rsOh3YyFfimdpgO gSquIbAgXfqXAANzQAN0pOdwBVu_v4FQcLYNVBVJossouG82RwLYDPxATosg RbS7FFQBRukJsjp6p3.p_F0TBu4Ij9GXBSvWP5q8Wlwqw58TtbrCXzhGYdoa _8s1MhOmM Received: from [75.148.181.52] by web81203.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:01:21 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/14.0.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.113.315625 X-Original-Message-ID: <1314817281.29965.YahooMailClassic@web81203.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:01:21 -0700 (PDT) From: William Miller Subject: Sir Isaac Re: LIV Shoulder Harness X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1429637979-1314817281=:29965" --0-1429637979-1314817281=:29965 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Okay, it's back to school time again, soooo...... Alert- Spoiler- MathemaPhobes should not read past this point:=A0=A0 "Word-= Problem" =A0 Crash survivalbility is an important consideration, especially given the hi= gh number of G-induced fatalities, in this speedy aircraft. Our main threat= here,=A0is brilliantly described by Sir Isaac, 423 years ago, because the = kinetic energy goes up as the square of the velocity. If you are going 2 ti= mes as fast, as=A0compared to=A0your FAA certified 62 mph'er,=A0when you hi= t the ditch, or barrier at the boundary of your emergency farmer's field, 4= times the forces must be disipated. 10-20 Gs in the X direction (eyeballs = out) is the limit of survivable crash forces. =A0 =A0Scenario: On takeoff, I checked all the multi-engine monitors in the gre= en, the FF hit 44 gph as I rotated and all seemed well, even though I brief= ed and reminded myself of a very low "abort threshold". If everything went = well in preflight (did I sample both tanks for water, strainer, and operati= onal fuel valve?), taxing, and runup, what are the odds of something catest= rophic happening, in a properly maintained, firewall forward, certified eng= ine? =A0=A0Well today it did it, started sputtering at 850 feet, and quit comple= tely just as I finished lowering the nose for glide, switching tanks, cycli= ng mags, low boost then high, twidling the knobs.... NADA. Now I've got 450= feet AGL and a nice 1000 foot farmers field 18 degrees to the left. If I j= ust clear the fence, on this end, and get full flaps touchdown at 89 KIAS (= std day). MAGS, master, valve=A0off, land, pop the door? (wait... is the ge= ar up or down- which is better?) Do you hold it off for a smooth touchdown = in ground effect, or plant it like we learned for short runway ops? At 70 K= IAS =3D 60 Kt GS =3D 30 meters/ second, how much distance do I need to surv= ive this today?=20 =A0 Hints:=A0 KE=3D 1/2 m v^2=A0=A0 1 G =3D 9.8 meter/sec^2=A0=A0 10 G =3D 98 m= eter/sec^2 =A0 Newton:=A0 F =3D m a =3D KE/d=A0=A0=A0 or=A0 KE=3D m a d=A0=A0 (mass drops = out=A0! ) =A0 Bonus question: What if my choices are water (ditching) vs unfriendly rocky= beach vs trees? =A0 Remember, the most important crash survivability criterion is prevervation = of the space around the human, properly restrained. Would airbags help? I d= on't have enough data. How 'bout 4 -5 point restraint - probably, but is there any data from certi= fication testing on the ES to Columbia to Cessna 400 certification?=A0=A0 h= mmm --0-1429637979-1314817281=:29965 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Okay, it's back to school time again, so= ooo......
Alert- Spoiler- MathemaPhobes should not read past this point: &n= bsp; "Word-Problem"
 
Crash survivalbility is an important consideration, especially given t= he high number of G-induced fatalities, in this speedy aircraft. Our main t= hreat here, is brilliantly described by Sir Isaac, 423 years ago, because the kinetic energy goes up as the square of the ve= locity. If you are going 2 times as fast, as compared to your FAA= certified 62 mph'er, when you hit the ditch, or barrier at the bounda= ry of your emergency farmer's field, 4 times the forces must be disipated. = 10-20 Gs in the X direction (eyeballs out) is the limit of survivable crash= forces.
 
 Scenario: On takeoff, I checked all the multi-engine monitors in= the green, the FF hit 44 gph as I rotated and all seemed well, even though= I briefed and reminded myself of a very low "abort threshold". If everythi= ng went well in preflight (did I sample both tanks for water, strainer, and= operational fuel valve?), taxing, and runup, what are the odds of somethin= g catestrophic happening, in a properly maintained, firewall forward, certi= fied engine?
  Well today it did it, started sputtering at 850 feet, and = quit completely just as I finished lowering the nose for glide, switching t= anks, cycling mags, low boost then high, twidling the knobs.... NADA. Now I= 've got 450 feet AGL and a nice 1000 foot farmers field 18 degrees to the l= eft. If I just clear the fence, on this end, and get full flaps touchdown a= t 89 KIAS (std day). MAGS, master, valve off, land, pop the door? (wai= t... is the gear up or down- which is better?) Do you hold it off for a smo= oth touchdown in ground effect, or plant it like we learned for short runwa= y ops? At 70 KIAS =3D 60 Kt GS =3D 30 meters/ second, how much distance do = I need to survive this today?
 
Hints:  KE=3D 1/2 m v^2   1 G =3D 9.8 meter/sec^2 =   10 G =3D 98 meter/sec^2
 
Newton:  F =3D m a =3D KE/d    or  KE=3D m a = d   (mass drops out ! )
 
Bonus question: What if my choices are water (ditching) vs unfriendly = rocky beach vs trees?
 
Remember, the most important crash survivability criterion is preverva= tion of the space around the human, properly restrained. Would airbags help= ? I don't have enough data.
How 'bout 4 -5 point restraint - probably, but is there any data from = certification testing on the ES to Columbia to Cessna 400 certification?&nb= sp;  hmmm
--0-1429637979-1314817281=:29965--