X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:27:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from gateway06.websitewelcome.com ([67.18.15.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with SMTP id 5110536 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:34:58 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.18.15.14; envelope-from=johnb@bohn-tech.com Received: (qmail 15478 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2011 14:35:35 -0000 Received: from gator667.hostgator.com (174.132.148.226) by gateway06.websitewelcome.com with SMTP; 1 Sep 2011 14:35:35 -0000 Received: from [75.134.1.107] (port=56189 helo=johnbohnPC) by gator667.hostgator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz8LT-0005EL-1Z; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 09:34:20 -0500 From: "John Bohn" X-Original-To: "'Dico Reijers'" , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: CO and a pressurized cabin -- is there a worry? X-Original-Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:34:21 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <003201cc68b4$3d7a77e0$b86f67a0$@bohn-tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0033_01CC688A.54A6E0E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AQGHTrfWBB0Z5fykpC0Pq6lfPvZZf5XCyQwQ Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator667.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bohn-tech.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-134-1-107.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com (johnbohnPC) [75.134.1.107]:56189 X-Source-Auth: johnb@bohn-tech.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: amNib2huNTA7amNib2huNTA7Z2F0b3I2NjcuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01CC688A.54A6E0E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I installed a CO guardian CO and cabin pressure alarm. I think the number is a 352P. I added an extra amber bright light. I'm confident the CO detector works because if you start your engine between hangers or on a windy day between hangers it alarms. The altitude alarm works good too but sometimes it false alarms on climb out but only around 9,000 ft. up at 26K or 27K (where I fly normally) its never given me problems. I've got 500 hours on it so far. Well worth the investment and very small. You can buy the panel mount or hide the remote mount out of the way. See link. http://guardianavionics.com/files/353-002RevOrig353353Rmanual.pdf John C. Bohn Office- 573-760-1090 Direct (cell) 503-887-2933 "Chance favors only the prepared mind" -Louis Pasteur- chemist, 1822-1895 From: Dico Reijers [mailto:dico@internetworks.ca] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:43 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: CO and a pressurized cabin -- is there a worry? Hi All, Since I'm new to the IV-P, I am wondering what the level of worry is of carbon monoxide getting into a pressurized cabin. I know with my old Cherokee or Mooney, I always had CO detectors (either electronic of that little cardboard thing that changes colour)... but with the pressurized cabin, I would think there may be less chance, perhaps close to no chance, of it getting into the cabin. Can someone please shed some light on this for me? Thanks, -Dico ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01CC688A.54A6E0E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I installed a CO guardian CO and cabin pressure alarm. I think = the number is a 352P. I added an extra amber bright light. = I’m confident the CO detector works because if you start your = engine between hangers or on a windy day between hangers it = alarms. The altitude alarm works good too but sometimes it false = alarms on climb out but only around 9,000 ft. up at 26K or 27K (where I = fly normally) its never given me problems. I’ve got 500 = hours on it so far. Well worth the investment and very = small. You can buy the panel mount or hide the remote mount out of = the way. See link.

http://guardianavionics.com/files/353-002RevOrig353353Rmanual.pdf

John C. Bohn

Office- 573-760-1090

Direct (cell) 503-887-2933

"Chance favors only the prepared mind" –Louis = Pasteur- chemist, 1822-1895

From:= = Dico Reijers [mailto:dico@internetworks.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, = August 31, 2011 6:43 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: CO and a pressurized cabin -- = is there a worry?

Hi = All,

Since I'm new to the IV-P, I am wondering what the level of = worry is of carbon monoxide getting into a pressurized cabin. I = know with my old Cherokee or Mooney, I always had CO detectors (either = electronic of that little cardboard thing that changes colour)... but = with the pressurized cabin, I would think there may be less chance, = perhaps close to no chance, of it getting into the cabin.

Can = someone please shed some light on this for = me?

Thanks,

-Dico

------=_NextPart_000_0033_01CC688A.54A6E0E0--