X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:47:30 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp144.dfw.emailsrvr.com ([67.192.241.144] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTPS id 5109362 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:55:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=67.192.241.144; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8F7BE1802F3 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:55:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp24.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: walter-AT-advancedpilot.com) with ESMTPSA id 6CE991802DE for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:55:02 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [LML] CO and a pressurized cabin -- is there a worry? From: Walter Atkinson In-Reply-To: X-Original-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 06:55:01 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Message-Id: <2B398B56-1E80-415F-9401-BDE5EB0A4EF3@advancedpilot.com> References: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) The question would be how is it pressurized and where is the air inlet? = It could actually be more likely in a pressurized airplane if the = exhaust and the air inlet are not optimally placed from a design = perspective. If properly designed, the chances would be very low. We = have seen aircraft that a change in AOA resulted in a change in the CO = content inside the cabin. That should not be possible in a pressurized = airplane where the cabin air is coming from the bleed off of the turbo = compressor, should it? =20 Walter On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:42 AM, Dico Reijers wrote: Hi All, Since I'm new to the IV-P, I am wondering what the level of worry is of = carbon monoxide getting into a pressurized cabin. I know with my old = Cherokee or Mooney, I always had CO detectors (either electronic of that = little cardboard thing that changes colour)... but with the pressurized = cabin, I would think there may be less chance, perhaps close to no = chance, of it getting into the cabin. Can someone please shed some light on this for me? Thanks, -Dico