X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:42:30 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5109283@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <dico@internetworks.ca>
Received: from mail-yi0-f52.google.com ([209.85.218.52] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1)
  with ESMTPS id 5108867 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:43:04 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.218.52; envelope-from=dico@internetworks.ca
Received: by yie13 with SMTP id 13so371145yie.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.43.52.199 with SMTP id vn7mr7368872icb.414.1314751349187; Tue,
 30 Aug 2011 17:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.133.131 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 17:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:42:29 -0300
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAAHhPZQTN-z9iGULgQNc11f9PsKBNdY7kUnv6-mh=BtvQLNnSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: CO and a pressurized cabin -- is there a worry?
From: Dico Reijers <dico@internetworks.ca>
X-Original-To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52e5f1322e45404abc267d3

--bcaec52e5f1322e45404abc267d3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi All,

Since I'm new to the IV-P, I am wondering what the level of worry is of
carbon monoxide getting into a pressurized cabin.  I know with my old
Cherokee or Mooney, I always had CO detectors (either electronic of that
little cardboard thing that changes colour)... but with the pressurized
cabin, I would think there may be less chance, perhaps close to no chance,
of it getting into the cabin.

Can someone please shed some light on this for me?

Thanks,

-Dico

--bcaec52e5f1322e45404abc267d3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi All,<br><br>Since I&#39;m new to the IV-P, I am wondering what the level=
 of worry is of carbon monoxide getting into a pressurized cabin.=A0 I know=
 with my old Cherokee or Mooney, I always had CO detectors (either electron=
ic of that little cardboard thing that changes colour)... but with the pres=
surized cabin, I would think there may be less chance, perhaps close to no =
chance, of it getting into the cabin.<br>
<br>Can someone please shed some light on this for me?<br><br>Thanks,<br><b=
r>-Dico<br>

--bcaec52e5f1322e45404abc267d3--