X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:16:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da05.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.147] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5070620 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:40:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.147; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-da05.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p71IeFhK004922 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:40:15 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.ea1.15b3fc3a (43965) for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:40:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com (smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.155]) by cia-dd02.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIADD026-d41e4e36f2fe2de; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:40:08 -0400 Received: from Webmail-m109 (webmail-m109.sim.aol.com [64.12.232.214]) by smtprly-md02.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMD024-d41e4e36f2fe2de; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:39:58 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Realistic landing speeds and distances X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:39:58 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 75.61.53.212 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE1E918C7DA33F_2E8_1ACFD_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33996-STANDARD Received: from 75.61.53.212 by Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com (64.12.232.214) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:39:58 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CE1E918C71BC8C-2E8-AE4F@Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CE1E918C7DA33F_2E8_1ACFD_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Ronald, Follow your instructors' advice. They were in the airplane-- not Scott.=20 Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Scott E Keighan To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 12:03 pm Subject: [LML] Re: Realistic landing speeds and distances Ronald, =20 I have gone in and out of 2500ft runways with my IV. No problem at all.= I plan for over the fence at=20 90 to 95kts for these runways. My normal over the fence is 100kts. Even= then only moderate braking is required. I am not at full gross of 3500 but more like around 3000lbs or less when doing this. I mus= t admit the first few times in and out of 2500ft is alittle unnerving. It does look really short. =20 My IV would be lighter then yours as I am non turbo and no presurization. My empty weight is 1950lbs. That may make a difference. But then again a= turbo has 50hp more then me. =20 Scott Keighan Lancair IV =20 =20 =20 =20 To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:30:58 -0400 From: Ronald@sdc.com Subject: [LML] Realistic landing speeds and distances Hello guys I have had my training in the IVP and I was wondering what kind of landing= speeds you are using and what kind of runways are your minimums ? I was taught 110 on Final and bout 3500ft for runway, however my stall spe= ed is at around 70kts (buffet starts at 73-74). Personally I am thinking= of getting it down to 90-95 over the fence? Than my runway should be ok= for 3000ft (sea level, no wind gust), right? So before going this route I thought it is better to ask=E2=80=A6.in the= air simulated it actually looks good lol =3D=3D Ronald =20 =3D=20 ----------MB_8CE1E918C7DA33F_2E8_1ACFD_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Ronald,
 
Follow your instructors' advice. They were in the airplane-- not Scot= t.
 
Jeff


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott E Keighan <scottekeighan@sympatico.ca>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 12:03 pm
Subject: [LML] Re: Realistic landing speeds and distances

Ronald,
 
I have gone in and out of 2500ft runways with my IV.  No problem at= all.  I plan for over the fence at
90 to 95kts for these runways.  My normal over the fence is 100kts.= Even then only moderate braking is required.  I am not at full
gross of 3500 but more like around 3000lbs or less when doing this. = I must admit the first few times in and out
of 2500ft is alittle unnerving.  It does look really short.
 
My IV would be lighter then yours as I am non turbo and no presurization.<= br> My empty weight is 1950lbs.  That may make a difference. But then aga= in a turbo has 50hp more then me.
 
Scott Keighan
Lancair IV
 
 
 

 

To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:30:58 -0400
From: Ronald@sdc.com
Subject: [LML] Realistic landing speeds and distances

Hello guys

I have had my training in the IVP and I was wondering what kind of la= nding speeds you are using and what kind of runways are your minimums ?

I was taught 110 on Final and bout 3500ft for runway, however my stal= l speed is at around 70kts (buffet starts at 73-74). Personally I am think= ing of getting it down to 90-95 over the fence? Than my runway should be= ok for 3000ft (sea level, no wind gust), right?

So before going this route I thought it is better to ask=E2=80=A6.in= the air simulated it actually looks good lol

=3D=3D Ronald

  
=3D
----------MB_8CE1E918C7DA33F_2E8_1ACFD_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com--