X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:16:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm17-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.93] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with SMTP id 5070613 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:43:55 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.91.93; envelope-from=wpedwards@hilgardhouse.com Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2011 18:43:18 -0000 Received: from [98.138.88.235] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2011 18:43:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Aug 2011 18:43:18 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 734137.75146.bm@omp1035.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 29809 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2011 18:43:18 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: EHUxN1gVM1lf2HO3JvczVfntbrrSdE_Q4SdbM2Jpxa2wCaq wF30fW88cPyN7i8NX7D8_ldW7sMExhpq_0aLdtL.c0K46w7kPCuF.Wy6prdQ BiUnObtP230QCy3hdzIi39wc0l976TFxZZTPD2lNBqviY66JmMT65sef3JGm UXveDX.3iyZGP5MUGPAHwflOi0qwnurGyQxEmGbVA5kJ8PvhMdTZNnuoHX7q WykQYLcEr2IpnDbrYr1NviVsF8VWnz6GuuSbRed8tEMZjYAs4l2JMkKBpPIN Nq.kPz_WJv6xBIbObDLGmBhJWBHGvVGL.Q_P7XEOKS_TZ0YnDiK0Vu6hlsRJ rgQNroqsDsdWb9a0tAl2qpakmeEcw2sX0PGk- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6upBwtCswBDzNn3Hc9VYjfiP97A_RnP6DYkxiNc- Received: from Office (wpedwards@76.175.74.188 with login) by smtp114.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 01 Aug 2011 11:43:18 -0700 PDT From: "wpedwards" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Realistic landing speeds and distances X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:43:17 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <00c601cc507a$e1421ba0$a3c652e0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CC5040.34E343A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcxQaGnfILc8AQKUS3eA6xD52lkCpQAEhVJg Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CC5040.34E343A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I went into a 2,800 strip occasionally but did not change landing numbers. Over the fence at 100 knots, flaps up after touchdown, moderate braking and stopped in 2,500 feet. Bill From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Ronald STEVENS Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 9:31 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Realistic landing speeds and distances Hello guys I have had my training in the IVP and I was wondering what kind of landing speeds you are using and what kind of runways are your minimums ? I was taught 110 on Final and bout 3500ft for runway, however my stall speed is at around 70kts (buffet starts at 73-74). Personally I am thinking of getting it down to 90-95 over the fence? Than my runway should be ok for 3000ft (sea level, no wind gust), right? So before going this route I thought it is better to ask..in the air simulated it actually looks good lol == Ronald ------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CC5040.34E343A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I went into a 2,800 strip occasionally but did not change landing = numbers. Over the fence at 100 knots, flaps up after touchdown, = moderate braking and stopped in 2,500 feet. = Bill

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Ronald STEVENS
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 9:31 = AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] = Realistic landing speeds and = distances

= Hello guys

= I have had my training in the IVP and I was wondering what kind of = landing speeds you are using and what kind of runways are your minimums = ?

= I was taught 110 on Final and bout 3500ft for runway, however my stall = speed is at around 70kts (buffet starts at 73-74). Personally I am = thinking of getting it down to 90-95 over the fence? Than my runway = should be ok for 3000ft (sea level, no wind gust), = right?

= So before going this route I thought it is better to ask….in the = air simulated it actually looks good = lol

= =3D=3D Ronald

------=_NextPart_000_00C7_01CC5040.34E343A0--