X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 02:16:38 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.143] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5070595 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:21:16 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.143; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-da01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p71IKZfF005424 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:20:35 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.1041.b9ea6cf (56031) for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:20:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com [205.188.84.131]) by cia-md08.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD085-d4054e36ee6b27d; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:20:31 -0400 Received: from Webmail-m109 (webmail-m109.sim.aol.com [64.12.232.214]) by smtprly-dd03.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDD031-d4054e36ee6b27d; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:20:27 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Re-doing my panel X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:20:27 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 75.61.53.212 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE1E8ED27F1BD6_2E8_19A81_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33996-STANDARD Received: from 75.61.53.212 by Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com (64.12.232.214) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:20:27 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CE1E8ED275967A-2E8-A843@Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CE1E8ED27F1BD6_2E8_19A81_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Also consider you are flying a NON-certificated experimental amateur built= aircraft in IMC for which there has been no system safety analysis of the= reliability of the entire airframe/ sytem.=20 Jeff fly like your life depends on it.... -----Original Message----- From: vtailjeff@aol.com To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 11:30 am Subject: [LML] Re: Re-doing my panel Brent Regan wrote a very good post a while back about why you should have= a=20 team gauge backup. Consider static interference. Jeff Sent from my iPad On Aug 1, 2011, at 7:06 AM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote: > Deco, =20 I would recommend a backup.=20 =20 Jeff =20 Sent from my iPad =20 On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Dico Reijers wrote: =20 > Hello, >=20 > After a trip to OshKosh, I'm planning on re-doing the panel in my IV-P.= I'm=20 ondering where the best place would be to get 2.25" airspeed, altimeter,= =20 ttitude indicator. The instruments I have now have Lancair logos on them,= so I=20 resume they shipped with the kit. Does Lancair have the 2.25" instruments= as=20 ell. >=20 > Also, if you were redoing the panel with a Garmin G3X system (3 screens= with=20 attery backup), would you even bother putting in the 3 steam guages as bac= kup=20 r is 3 screens redundant enough? >=20 > Finally, is there a market for the instruments/avionics I take out? Per= haps=20 arnstormers.... stuff like vision microsystems engine monitor, sandel= ehsi,=20 team guages, etc. >=20 > Thanks folks! >=20 > -Dico =20 -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml -- or archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ----------MB_8CE1E8ED27F1BD6_2E8_19A81_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Also consider you are flying a NON-certificated experimental amateur= built aircraft in IMC for which there has been no system safety analysis= of the reliability of the entire airframe/ sytem.
 
Jeff
 
fly like your life depends on it....


-----Original Message-----
From: vtailjeff@aol.com
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Aug 1, 2011 11:30 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Re-doing my panel

Bre=
nt Regan wrote a very good post a while back about why you should have a=
=20
steam gauge backup. Consider static interference.

Jeff

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 1, 2011, at 7:06 AM, vtailjeff=
@aol.com wrote:

> Deco,
>=20
> I would recommend a backup.=20
>=20
> Jeff
>=20
> Sent from my iPad
>=20
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Dico Reijers <dico@internetworks.ca> wrote:
>=20
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> After a trip to OshKosh, I'm planning on re-doing the panel in my=
 IV-P.  I'm=20
wondering where the best place would be to get 2.25" airspeed, altimeter,=
=20
attitude indicator.  The instruments I have now have Lancair logos on them=
, so I=20
presume they shipped with the kit.  Does Lancair have the 2.25" instrument=
s as=20
well.
>>=20
>> Also, if you were  redoing the panel with a Garmin G3X system (3=
 screens with=20
battery backup), would you even bother putting in the 3 steam guages as ba=
ckup=20
or is 3 screens redundant enough?
>>=20
>> Finally, is there a market for the instruments/avionics I take ou=
t?  Perhaps=20
Barnstormers....    stuff like vision microsystems engine monitor, sandel=
 ehsi,=20
steam guages, etc.
>>=20
>> Thanks folks!
>>=20
>> -Dico
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/=
lml/List.html

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L=
ist.html
----------MB_8CE1E8ED27F1BD6_2E8_19A81_Webmail-m109.sysops.aol.com--