X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 15:31:57 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s4.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.79] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.0) with ESMTP id 5067401 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 29 Jul 2011 04:48:47 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.79; envelope-from=cgainza@msn.com Received: from BLU139-W14 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s4.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:48:10 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: cgainza@msn.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_12b97561-9a26-4052-8192-579e40c23ec3_" X-Originating-IP: [24.208.2.50] From: Craig Gainza X-Original-To: list lancair Subject: RE: [LML] Re: New Bose and Pressurization ? X-Original-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 01:48:10 -0700 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jul 2011 08:48:10.0456 (UTC) FILETIME=[3E865580:01CC4DCC] --_12b97561-9a26-4052-8192-579e40c23ec3_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't have the A20's=2C but I have the A10's. The hinge at the top of th= e A10's (A20's are the same) headband has been a problem in my IV-P due to = minimal headroom. =20 I have pounded the overhead console on many occasion in light to moderate t= urbulence. Yesterday=2C I traded for Zulu 2's. One of the reasons was the= increased headroom I get with the design. Craig Gainza To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu=2C 28 Jul 2011 07:49:05 -0400 From: colyncase@earthlink.net Subject: [LML] Re: New Bose and Pressurization ? going back to the beginning of this thread: Has anyone else had problems = with the Bose A20....of any sort? On Jul 22=2C 2011=2C at 8:17 AM=2C RONALD STEVENS wrote:Hello guys Today I was training again (with Bob Jeffrey) with my new 4p and noticed th= at I had a lot of static noise in my new Bose headset (the new X)=2C and wa= s wondering if you had the same? (I have an old Bose also and this one work= s ok). We played with the pressurization and we noticed that it did react on it.= =85..anybody having the same ? Thanks =97 Ronald Ps Lancair 4p=2C 7 hours and counting=2C using 3 different CFII's lol =3B)~ = --_12b97561-9a26-4052-8192-579e40c23ec3_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don't have the A20's=2C but I have the A10's. =3B The hinge at the to= p of the A10's (A20's are the same) headband has been a problem in my IV-P = due to minimal headroom. =3B

I have pounded the overhead consol= e on many occasion in light to moderate turbulence. =3B Yesterday=2C I = traded for Zulu 2's. =3B One of the reasons was the increased headroom = I get with the design.

Craig Gainza

To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu=2C 28 Jul 2011 07:49:05 -0400From: colyncase@earthlink.net
Subject: [LML] Re: New Bose and Pressuriz= ation ?

going back to the b= eginning of this thread: =3B Has anyone =3Belse had problem= s with the Bose A20....of any sort?

On Jul 22=2C 2011=2C = at 8:17 AM=2C RONALD STEVENS wrote:

Hello guy= s

Today I was training again (with Bob Jeffrey) wi= th my new 4p and noticed that I had a lot of static noise in my new Bose he= adset (the new X)=2C and was wondering if you had the same? (I have an old = Bose also and this one works ok).

We played with t= he pressurization and we noticed that it did react on it.=85..anybody havin= g the same ?

Thanks =97 Ronald

Ps Lancair 4p=2C 7 hours and counting=2C using 3 different CFII's lol= =3B)~

= --_12b97561-9a26-4052-8192-579e40c23ec3_--