X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 17:38:10 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4570029 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 15:09:57 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=Wolfgang@MiCom.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:17 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=OZYqEDjMAAAA:8 a=sd-0feWErJ9GVwLlccYA:9 a=ss1XibzVF6EZn757oPYA:7 a=YNDR9VSxedafbBt2PS7jiYd0TaoA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=CVU0O5Kb7MsA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=UgPrL5zNBxQA:10 a=Whv8HLVs5OMA:10 a=XyR41dH0tbTkaXaX:21 a=f82BLJKxfEhvl8Ry:21 a=PKzPiRI0eW7ukkiK1foA:9 a=NryAG2NDOb2U9Ax3kT0A:7 a=FlatjyuBBmJbWpTvnWMIO5_qR4IA:4 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.218.201.50 Received: from [74.218.201.50] ([74.218.201.50:1930] helo=Lobo) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 8D/BC-12606-27707DC4; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:09:23 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000901cb7ec0$05842cc0$6401a8c0@Lobo> From: "Wolfgang" X-Original-To: Subject: Re: Arizona Aircraft Tax X-Original-Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 16:09:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB7E96.1C917500" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB7E96.1C917500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wonder how the state would react once sued for theft by conversion ? - - - (calling it a "property tax" and then trying to collect it) Wolfgang From: N66mg@aol.com=20 Sender: =20 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Arizona Aircraft Tax=20 Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:41:40 -0400=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 =20 =20 California will try and collect taxes on anything and sometimes = people just pay it. It is funny when you confront them most times they = back down. I had an employee who lives in Los Angeles proper and is in = sales and they tried to tax him on his salary saying he had a business = in L.A. County. He had a lawyer send them a letter and that was all he = heard from them. I guess most people back down and pay it and it's = going to get worse with the people in power now Michael L-IV 95% In a message dated 11/3/2010 1:32:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, = lancair-esp@ustek.com writes: -----Original Message----- From: Lorn H Olsen [mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us]=20 The states all have inspectors that make sure airplanes keep at = airports are registered correctly and have paid the appropriate taxes.>>> Worse than true! =20 I had parked my plane in California for a week for engine work. = The next month I got a bill from the Calif. taxation department for = personal property tax. I suggested they shove it and they suggested that = they would file a lien on the aircraft title until the tax was paid. = The plane was seen at an airport when their inspector was taking = inventory and was therefore subject to Calif. taxation. Took weeks of = calls and letters and documents to convince them I did not live and the = aircraft was not based in California. =20 So yes they have inspectors but they are happy to collect = inappropriate taxes as well. :-( Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES -- For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB7E96.1C917500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wonder how the state would react once = sued for=20 theft by conversion ?
- - - (calling it a "property tax" and = then trying=20 to collect it)
 
Wolfgang
 
lml@lancaironline.net
From: N66mg@aol.com
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Arizona Aircraft = Tax
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:41:40 = -0400
To:
California will try=20 and collect taxes on anything and sometimes people just pay = it.  It=20 is funny when you confront them most times they back down.  I = had an=20 employee who lives in Los Angeles proper and is in sales and they = tried to=20 tax him on his salary saying he had a business in L.A. = County.  He=20 had a lawyer send them a letter and that was all he heard = from=20 them.  I guess most people back down and pay it and it's = going to get=20 worse with the people in power now
Michael
L-IV = 95%
 
In a message dated 11/3/2010 1:32:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight = Time,=20 lancair-esp@ustek.com writes:
-----Original=20 Message-----
From: Lorn H Olsen [mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us] =
The=20 states all have inspectors that make sure airplanes keep at=20 airports
are registered correctly and have paid the = appropriate=20 taxes.>>>

Worse than true! 

I had = parked my=20 plane in California for a week for engine work.  = The
next month=20 I got a bill from the Calif. taxation department for=20 personal
property tax.  I suggested they shove it and = they=20 suggested that they
would file a lien on the aircraft title = until the=20 tax was paid.  The
plane was seen at an airport when = their=20 inspector was taking inventory
and was therefore subject to = Calif.=20 taxation.  Took weeks of calls and
letters and documents = to=20 convince them I did not live and the aircraft
was not based = in=20 California. 

So yes they have inspectors but they = are happy=20 to collect inappropriate
taxes as well.  = :-(

Robert M.=20 Simon
ES-P N301ES

--
For archives and unsub=20 = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
<= /DIV>
------=_NextPart_000_0006_01CB7E96.1C917500--