X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:41:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4554140 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:40:33 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.96; envelope-from=N66mg@aol.com Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imr-db02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA3KdtJi028284 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:39:55 -0400 Received: from N66mg@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.ca5.6a1c4267 (43910) for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:39:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-m23.mail.aol.com (magic-m23.mail.aol.com [172.20.22.196]) by cia-dc07.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC077-ab864cd1c88ed; Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:39:43 -0400 From: N66mg@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 16:39:42 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Arizona Aircraft Tax X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b9a69.7816b896.3a03228e_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-AOL-IP: 70.181.73.241 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: N66mg@aol.com --part1_b9a69.7816b896.3a03228e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit California will try and collect taxes on anything and sometimes people just pay it. It is funny when you confront them most times they back down. I had an employee who lives in Los Angeles proper and is in sales and they tried to tax him on his salary saying he had a business in L.A. County. He had a lawyer send them a letter and that was all he heard from them. I guess most people back down and pay it and it's going to get worse with the people in power now Michael L-IV 95% In a message dated 11/3/2010 1:32:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, lancair-esp@ustek.com writes: -----Original Message----- From: Lorn H Olsen [mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us] The states all have inspectors that make sure airplanes keep at airports are registered correctly and have paid the appropriate taxes.>>> Worse than true! I had parked my plane in California for a week for engine work. The next month I got a bill from the Calif. taxation department for personal property tax. I suggested they shove it and they suggested that they would file a lien on the aircraft title until the tax was paid. The plane was seen at an airport when their inspector was taking inventory and was therefore subject to Calif. taxation. Took weeks of calls and letters and documents to convince them I did not live and the aircraft was not based in California. So yes they have inspectors but they are happy to collect inappropriate taxes as well. :-( Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_b9a69.7816b896.3a03228e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

California will= try and=20 collect taxes on anything and sometimes people just pay it. It is fu= nny=20 when you confront them most times they back down. I had an employee= who=20 lives in Los Angeles proper and is in sales and they tried to tax him on= his=20 salary saying he had a business in L.A. County. He had a lawyer send= them=20 a letter and that was all he heard from them. I guess most peop= le=20 back down and pay it and it's going to get worse with the people in power= =20 now

Michael<= /DIV>

L-IV 95%=

In a message dated 11/3/2010 1:32:00 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,=20 lancair-esp@ustek.com writes:

-----Original Message-----
From: Lorn H= Olsen=20 [mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us]
The states all have inspectors that make= sure=20 airplanes keep at airports
are registered correctly and have paid the= =20 appropriate taxes.>>>

Worse than true!

I= had=20 parked my plane in California for a week for engine work. The
n= ext=20 month I got a bill from the Calif. taxation department for=20 personal
property tax. I suggested they shove it and they sugge= sted=20 that they
would file a lien on the aircraft title until the tax was= =20 paid. The
plane was seen at an airport when their inspector was= =20 taking inventory
and was therefore subject to Calif. taxation. = Took=20 weeks of calls and
letters and documents to convince them I did not= live=20 and the aircraft
was not based in California.

So yes th= ey=20 have inspectors but they are happy to collect inappropriate
taxes as= =20 well. :-(

Robert M. Simon
ES-P N301ES

--
For= =20 archives and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--part1_b9a69.7816b896.3a03228e_boundary--