X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:50:07 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [70.62.14.124] (HELO ustek.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4550949 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 16:12:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=70.62.14.124; envelope-from=r.simon@ustek.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: HP per gallon burned Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 16:16:54 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: HP per gallon burned Thread-Index: Act6AGXp0zZ3RD+0QdyHr07s+ekuHA== From: "Lancair" X-Original-Sender: "Robert Simon" X-Original-To: X-Original-Cc: "Joseph Neustein" I have seen different conversions of fuel burned to horsepower generated = so I went back to the GAMI wizards for the details.=20 John-Paul said: >>> Typically, the 8.5:1 compression ration engines use 14.9 hp/gph = while the 7.5:1 CR engines use 13.7 hp/gph. The TSIO-550-E engines use 24=B0 BTDC timing and are a little more = efficient that the typical 7.5:1 CR engines, though. George speculates ~14.6 hp/gph.=A0 Looking at the operation manual, it = looks more like 14.75 hp/gph. <<<=20 So there ya' go.=A0Take your pick. Robert M. Simon ES-P N301ES