X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:04:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4550697 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:46:57 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.82; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP id <20101101174621.GPJM4190.mta31.charter.net@imp09> for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 13:46:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([75.132.241.174]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id RtmM1f00C3mUFT705tmMEl; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:46:21 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=TJmx5WUgAAAA:8 a=5Up8faWwAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=2ylKX3HFwpeni03_TpEA:9 a=tmlz45Ap-wtowFi4EuQv19Rp5ioA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=v6MMM96S_sUA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=zr9XO895aXOjG2vZBX4A:9 a=Ni2dXKRgzD_RTMavINUA:7 a=BbLtRbVCBZXZ5FvLXS6cdKu0V6QA:4 From: Terrence O'Neill Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-101--1058747601 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance X-Original-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 12:46:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <2E398DCC-EAC8-40E3-9E83-23B71E9A9AFB@charter.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) --Apple-Mail-101--1058747601 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Jeff, May I ask for a little more detail on when the LOP condition starts? = Do all EGTs have to be LOPP, or is it when just the leanest one goes? = And, how lean constitutes enough to be considered LOP? Thanks, terrence L235/I-320 On Nov 1, 2010, at 12:26 PM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote: > Steve, > =20 > You can run LOP at that power setting and higher.....check out = www.gami.com > =20 > Jeff Edwards > LOP not recommended by most of the gurus at that setting. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Colyn Case > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Sent: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 6:47 am > Subject: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance >=20 > It's not how hard you run your engine. It's how you run it hard. >=20 > On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Steve Richard wrote: >=20 >> Fuel flow at 75% is around 23 gph. LOP not recommended by most of = the gurus at that setting. >> Steve Richard >> On Oct 30, 2010 8:35 AM, "Carl Scheid" wrote: >=20 --Apple-Mail-101--1058747601 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Jeff,

May I ask for a little more detail on when the LOP condition starts? Do all EGTs have to be LOPP, or is it when just the leanest one goes? And, how lean constitutes enough to be considered LOP?

Thanks,

terrence

L235/I-320

On Nov 1, 2010, at 12:26 PM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote:

Steve,

You can run LOP at that power setting and higher.....check out www.gami.com

Jeff Edwards

LOP not recommended by most of the gurus at that setting.

-----Original Message-----
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 6:47 am
Subject: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance

It's not how hard you run your engine. It's how you run it hard.

On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Steve Richard wrote:

Fuel flow at 75% is around 23 gph. LOP not recommended by most of the gurus at that setting.

Steve Richard

On Oct 30, 2010 8:35 AM, "Carl Scheid" <cscheid@charter.net> wrote:

--Apple-Mail-101--1058747601--