X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 13:26:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4550400 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:03:08 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.207.164; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oA1F2UIo032314 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:02:30 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.fa0.c45246 (43899) for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:02:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.140]) by cia-dc06.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILCIADC064-5c494cced67d2cf; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02:25 -0400 Received: from webmail-m086 (webmail-m086.sim.aol.com [64.12.224.198]) by smtprly-ma01.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA017-5c494cced67d2cf; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02:21 -0400 References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02:21 -0400 X-AOL-IP: 75.61.53.8 In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD47ECEB7F70A0_1364_83_webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32823-STANDARD Received: from 75.61.53.8 by webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com (64.12.224.198) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:02:21 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CD47ECEA407754-1364-34@webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: VTAILJEFF@aol.com ----------MB_8CD47ECEB7F70A0_1364_83_webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Steve, You can run LOP at that power setting and higher.....check out www.gami.c= om Jeff Edwards LOP not recommended by most of the gurus at that setting. -----Original Message----- From: Colyn Case To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 6:47 am Subject: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance It's not how hard you run your engine. It's how you run it hard. On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Steve Richard wrote: Fuel flow at 75% is around 23 gph. LOP not recommended by most of the gur= us at that setting. Steve Richard On Oct 30, 2010 8:35 AM, "Carl Scheid" wrote: ----------MB_8CD47ECEB7F70A0_1364_83_webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Steve,
 
You can run LOP at that power setting and higher.....check out = www.gami.com
 
Jeff Edwards
LOP= not recommended by most of the gurus at that setting.




-----Original Message-----
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 6:47 am
Subject: [LML] Re: LNC4 Performance

It's not how= hard you run your engine.  It's how you run it hard.

On Oct 31, 2010, at 9:39 PM, Steve Richard wrote:

Fuel flow at 75% is around 23 gph.  LOP not recommended by most= of the gurus at that setting.
Steve Richard
On Oct 30, 2010 8:35 AM, "Carl Scheid" <cscheid@charter.net> wrote:

----------MB_8CD47ECEB7F70A0_1364_83_webmail-m086.sysops.aol.com--