Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:44:12 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4549649@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.62; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=GdurI6MuRmCUb0Aw7X/pDWEhwRoaM5C1Xu9jZrmjI1Lue/QK1fX630Z7W32hBixT;
  h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: [LML] hydraulic hoses
From: Colyn Case <colyncase@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-4545556@logan.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <list-4545556@logan.com>

I have them (not sure about the reusable eaton part).  =20
I think if I had to do it over again I would lose the stainless except =
where I was worried about fire or abrasion or collapsing.

On Oct 28, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Gary Toups wrote:

> Has anyone used stainless steel covered PTFE hyd hoses with the =
reusable
> Eaton fittings for hydraulics and/or brakes?  I ordered some and =
tested to
> 2,500 psi; no leaks. See links for the particulars.
>=20
> =
http://www.discounthydraulichose.com/SAE_37_JIC_Female_Swivel_p/63-190600.=
ht
> m
>=20
> =
http://www.discounthydraulichose.com/SAE_100R14A_Teflon_reg_PTFE_Hydraulic=
_H
> ose_p/r14-hose.htm
>=20
>=20
> What is the down side to using this setup?
>=20
> Gary Toups
> N300GT
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --
> For archives and unsub =
http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html