X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:47:39 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [66.70.126.15] (HELO omta0112.mta.everyone.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.9) with ESMTP id 4474592 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:26:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.70.126.15; envelope-from=bknotts@buckeye-express.com Received: from dm0225.mta.everyone.net (sj1-slb03-gw2 [172.16.1.96]) by omta0112.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FB45A830A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:25:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Eon-Dm: dm0225 Received: by dm0225.mta.everyone.net (EON-AUTHRELAY2 - 1835a814) id dm0225.4c97c4cd.2cf2c for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 02:25:43 -0700 X-Eon-Sig: AQK8DXBMmHoXSkIz/gIAAAAB,22577ead4b355581849add1c27394747 X-Original-Message-ID: <4C987A17.1040307@buckeye-express.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:25:43 -0400 From: "F. Barry Knotts" Reply-To: bknotts884@earthlink.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: lancair propjet at osh auction References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100920-1, 09/20/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Move up to a C340 and you get pressurization. Really very little more in initial cost than a T310R and essentially the same maintenance since pressurization requires very little in that department. Lots of them out there for sale to choose from. You can get air conditioning and known ice, too. (Oh, did I mention, I have one for sale....) Barry Knotts LIV-P, N4XE Perrysburg, Ohio On 9/17/2010 10:54 AM, Colyn Case wrote: > David, just saw your post about the p210....and your luck at avoiding it. > > ...was wondering if you had considered something bigger. The p210 is really a 4-place + dog airplane with really anemic climb. > I had considered one for 1-2 people travel but concluded I would either get a p210R (pricey) or a T210 for performance reasons. > > What about a T310R? 6 real seats and climb to spare. Currently going for $150K to $200K for a nice one. > no pressurization, and that sucks, but I don't see a comfortable seriously 6-place airplane out there with pressure unless you go to a 414 or a 421. > Baron's a too small I think. > ....Malibu maybe. or jet-prop or Meridian. all of those are range challenged. > Aero-star not big enough inside. > > The problem with the lancair is you can never get your money out of it. but the flip side is spam cans are exceedingly cheap, especially twins. > My solution was to get a bad weather family spam can (TR182 with tks) and keep the lancair for me. > I'm feeling a little T210 envy right now but we'll see how the economics pan out. I was betting the TR182 would be 30% cheaper to fly. > I was a big pressure bigot until I realized that I mostly fly alone and the number of times I fly with passengers AND have to go above 12000 is not that > great. We'll see if they concur with me a year from now.... I had to go to fl200 with the TR182 on the way back from OSH and didn't think it was > so bad as I had imagined. > > Colyn > > > > On Aug 1, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Dr. Weinsweig wrote: > >> anybody have any idea how much the lancair propjet at auction at airventure sold for and was it a good plane. just curious. >> >> david weinsweig >> propjet n750dw for sale >> 304-633-5221 >> >> >> -- >> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >