Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:53 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4473425@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.130.116.53; envelope-from=hwasti@lm50.com
From: Hamid Wasti <hwasti@lm50.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 N33AN document question
References: <list-4473317@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4473317@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Danny,

I know you have decided to walk away, but in case you had not, here are=20
my $0.02.

Very very early in the process, I would want to inquire into what=20
happened to the paperwork. The paperwork may be missing because what it=20
shows is detrimental to the valuation or marketability. The paperwork=20
may be missing because it is being held hostage by someone; maybe an ex=20
spouse, an ex business partner or someone who has a financial claim but=20
does not know enough to file a lien with the FAA.

For me, the missing paperwork would raise some serious questions not=20
only about the construction and the damage history but also the big=20
picture surrounding the airplane. If I considered moving forward, the=20
examination would be extra thorough with a much higher threshold to walk =

and even after all of that, the price would reflect the risk of the unkno=
wn.

Regards,

Hamid


Danny Miller wrote:
>
> There=92s the issue with this one Rob. There are absolutely NO records,=
=20
> none, zero, nada, zilch. But I=92ve already decided to walk away from i=
t.
>
> Danny Miller
>
> N 38=B0 43' 27"
>
> W 77=B0 30' 38"
>
>