X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 07:47:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.5) with ESMTP id 4217090 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:16:57 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.124; envelope-from=Wolfgang@MiCom.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=0UlR9Czu668I0eXMyLHigKWn+OyLjOz56zOl0XCIY6Q= c=1 sm=0 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:17 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=-WCy7YTNSZ5SJE7lgg4A:9 a=l2vrrxY4mmf640pmuJEiab4jV5gA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=si9q_4b84H0A:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=RL50gjcNh39FG7sWqccA:9 a=DpNObsM2uUfUbXVLW0QA:7 a=BUGwUlI-0hE34XmODqxj1mZdMJAA:4 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.218.201.50 Received: from [74.218.201.50] ([74.218.201.50:1325] helo=Lobo) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 58/1B-25212-6AAE0CB4; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:16:23 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000701cad8f3$0d7abac0$6401a8c0@Lobo> From: "Wolfgang" X-Original-To: Subject: Re: gear retract problems - 320 X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 17:16:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CAD8D1.862D7150" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CAD8D1.862D7150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable That would work . . . . but wouldn't it be preferable to have a solution = that keeps the problem from becoming a problem requiring in flight = attention in the first place ? Wolfgang From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd." =20 Sender: =20 Subject: Re: gear retract problems - 320=20 Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:53:14 -0400=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 =20 =20 =20 So, would not the simple solution be to wire both sides of each = pressure switch to a momentary push button switch? I have gages installed and so can observe the hi/lo pressures. A = push of the momentary switch should start the pump. Angier Ames N4ZQ ...moving ever closer to first flight...=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CAD8D1.862D7150 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
That would work . . . . but wouldn't it = be=20 preferable to have a solution that keeps the problem from becoming a = problem=20 requiring in flight attention in the first place ?
 
Wolfgang
 
lml@lancaironline.net
From: "Greenbacks, UnLtd."=20 <N4ZQ@comcast.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: gear retract problems - = 320
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:53:14 = -0400
To:


 
So, would not the simple solution be to = wire both=20 sides of each pressure switch to a momentary push button = switch?
I have=20 gages installed and so can observe the hi/lo pressures. A push of = the=20 momentary switch should start the pump.

Angier=20 Ames
N4ZQ
...moving ever closer to first=20 flight...
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CAD8D1.862D7150--