I have to agree with Bruce. I went through
several iterations to arrive at my final decision. I had some excellent input
from experienced owners on this list. The first was a full size (primary) EFIS
and smaller backup, produced by the same manufacturer. What a great way to save
money and panel space. However, after analysis, this left me exposed to the
potential for dual failure if there was an error in the software. Well, that
was easy enough to fix, use different manufacturers. After some additional
input from highly experienced owners who had or were flying some full qualified
equipment, I realized that in the event of a lightning strike, I would probably
fry both units. I bit the bullet and purchased a set of mechanical backup
instruments with dedicated battery backup. It was more expensive then I wanted,
the panel was more cluttered, but it provided the piece of mind I wanted for my
family. Do I plan on flying IFR, at times, do I plan on getting into storms
with lightning, absolutely not, but some times we are not the masters of our
own destiny.
Giff Marr
LIV-P/Mistral 70%
From: Bruce Gray
[mailto:Bruce@glasair.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 8:36
PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Selecting
an EFIS
While I'm sure some will call me a Ludite
or a fool, I'd go with a vacuum Attitude gyro. If all your flight instruments
are going to be powered by electo-wizzies, I'd want a separate system as a
backup. You also need a ASI and altimeter.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List
[mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of John
Hafen
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:32
AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Selecting an
EFIS
Are any of you aware of an independent, stand-alone, self powered attitude
back-up system?
I was looking at the Garmin 495. Its panel page shows heading, bank
angle, and vertical speed. So I assume with a little concentration, that
would allow a guy to approximate straight and level flight. But there is
no “attitude indicator.”
Is there something out there better than the 495?
John Hafen