Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #47510
From: George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] plugs, etc.
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:36:26 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Paul,
 
>>'Seems to me that is some of the best instrumentation you could have of the correct heat range of the plug, bar none.<<
 

respectfully disagree. 
 
Here is why:  "Appearance"  as in  'seams to me'  - -  is just a corollary to the    "hope is a method [not] "   frame of mind  that is really not appropriate for aircraft related activities.
 
I have instrumented up plugs and flown them.
 
These plugs covered several heat ranges.  They all  ended up looking the same to random observers - - and their critical core temperatures covered a sufficiently wide range to qualify as "good" or "marginal".
 
Regards,  George
 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Paul Lipps
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 7:48 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] plugs, etc.

Gary! You made an excellent point about looking at the plug to determine if it is the right heat range. I remember the illustrations in my auto manuals that showed the pictures of plugs that were too cold, too hot, or just right. 'Seems to me that is some of the best instrumentation you could have of the correct heat range of the plug, bar none. Too hot and the insulator was blistered; too cold and it was covered with eposits; just right and it had a nice, light tan coating on the insulator! BTW, Lycoming is making available cylinders drilled and tapped for automotive plugs. Maybe somebody should warn them. Or maybe they have done some testing with EI systems and found them acceptable; they have!
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster