X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 20:55:32 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp101.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.200.236] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with SMTP id 2943097 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 May 2008 18:03:51 -0400 Received: (qmail 37741 invoked from network); 28 May 2008 22:03:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (ameyer@mil-amax.com@24.7.195.235 with plain) by smtp101.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 May 2008 22:03:49 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: yexDBXwVM1kHLcD90765dQ9.LWXbWAti8rzMpAl.vsFMTqY._ZXc5aKdB3w9tABYZhzPCmQ6N5a623PBIcFO9j8kEsW8M4tjsYqJbZ9MDjChkA5zEo86zIb7QWChlROCmuQ- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Original-Message-ID: <483DD6C4.6030709@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 17:03:48 -0500 From: Andrew Meyer Reply-To: meyerf16@gmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.8) Gecko/20071009 SeaMonkey/1.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Fuel Probes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All... Working on some details of a 360 fuel system - replacing the float probes... I am in the process of installing new fuel probes in both the wings and the header tank and am leaning towards the Princeton capacitive probes as I prefer the lack of moving parts of a capacitive probe. Which probes are going to be optimum in the wings and header tank? Also, what is a good secondary backup fuel level probe or sensor for the header tank above and beyond the visual tube? I'm planning on using the fuel probe in the header to activate the fuel pumps from the wings to refuel the header, but want a second system (independent) for warning of a low header fuel situation. Thoughts? Andy -- Andrew Meyer ameyer@mil-amax.com P: 630-618-8800