X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:08:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.17] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.0) with ESMTP id 2724503 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:02:12 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.62.17; envelope-from=jimauman@comcast.net Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id oB4j1Y0030SCNGk5A09T00; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:06 +0000 Received: from OFFICE ([71.194.176.117]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id oD1C1Y0022YMHK33V00000; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:24 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=RMCbWqZ1nJAA:10 a=ff_d3fiX4OUAJg7FbbQA:9 a=WNAt_M8EEZYIsUoHedOsW1wPZH0A:4 a=gi0PWCVxevcA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=Ryx0u4L3y_bBcB_cqMMA:9 a=R3F6RMjc4DKRQYEnB6wA:7 a=kcG0QBYDUCivc5odzbbFuhX2GFYA:4 a=37WNUvjkh6kA:10 From: "Jim Auman" X-Original-To: Subject: [LML] Accepted Verbage for Annual Signoff X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:01:00 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <003f01c86cae$272e1560$6601a8c0@OFFICE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0040_01C86C7B.DC93A560" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchsriYU/4H5pM6wSHqsTBX4PyddrA== This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C86C7B.DC93A560 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am offering this comment as a gentle reminder folks to actually read your operating limitations and be sure they are attached to your 8130-6. Look At your Operating Limitations, around item number 24 or 25. The limitation is very clear, generally in bold face type and in quotations. It is the minimum, or similarly worded statement, but it is always in your limitations. Your DAR was obligated to review that process with you. In any event, the Operating Limitations are a part of your 8130-6 Special Airworthiness Certificate and are to be attached to and on your aircraft at all times. (Read Item #1 of your limitations) Your question suggests that you have not read your operating limitations in a while, hence maybe they are not on board your aircraft, hence you are violating a basic tenant of you're A/W certificate. If I am incorrect in my suspicions, I apologize. A minimum signoff statement is clearly stated in your Ops Limits. Jim ------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C86C7B.DC93A560 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am offering this comment as a = gentle reminder folks to actually read your operating limitations and be sure = they are attached to your 8130-6.

Look At your Operating Limitations, = around item number 24 or 25. The limitation is very clear, generally in = bold face type and in quotations. It is the minimum, or similarly = worded statement, but it is always in your limitations. Your DAR was = obligated to review that process with you.

In any event, the Operating = Limitations are a part of your 8130-6 Special Airworthiness Certificate and are to = be attached to and on your aircraft at all times. (Read Item #1 of your limitations) Your question suggests that you have not read your = operating limitations in a while, hence maybe they are not on board your aircraft, = hence you are violating a basic tenant of you’re A/W certificate. =

If I am incorrect in my suspicions, = I apologize. A minimum signoff statement is clearly stated in your = Ops Limits.

Jim

------=_NextPart_000_0040_01C86C7B.DC93A560--