X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 13:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ironport5.liveoakmail.com ([216.110.12.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2637648 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:26:22 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.110.12.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJJ2hEdAMf4VjGdsb2JhbACQHAEBAYFPmBc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,263,1196661600"; d="scan'208";a="41813158" Received: from rs5.liveoakhosting.com (HELO secure5.liveoakhosting.com) ([64.49.254.21]) by ironport5.liveoakmail.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2008 09:25:41 -0600 Received: (qmail 26378 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2008 09:25:41 -0600 Received: from 216-107-97-170.static.networktel.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (216.107.97.170) by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 9 Jan 2008 09:25:41 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: <49A09F2E-E161-4A30-8350-EC13A52D6EFB@advancedpilot.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: water ingestion in rain and engine stoppage X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:25:39 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) OK, anybody have a plausible theory on how adding carb heat will REMOVE the water? Just making it vapor makes it combustible??? Walter On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Tom Gourley wrote: "the use of carburettor heat in heavy rain is recommended both to prevent build of of carby ice and to avoid engine stoppage" I recall reading in some flying magazine article about having to use carb heat (seems like it was partial carb heat) in a C172 during heavy rain. If my memory is correct (not necessarily guaranteed) that was for a specific C172 model and engine combination. Later models of the C172 did not have this recommendation. I don't remember ever seeing a similar recommendation in the Lycoming O-320 or O-360 powered Pipers or Grummans that I flew. Maybe I should look through the old POHs that I have in my library. Tom Gourley -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/ List.html