X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:13:18 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2637024 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:13:45 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.136; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-d20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.3.) id q.c66.25bf7d2a (34934) for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:13:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from FWM-D38 (fwm-d38.webmail.aol.com [205.188.162.14]) by cia-da04.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA047-8876478449cd1d9; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:13:01 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Legacy Wing Bolt Torque Specs X-Original-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:13:01 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 72.19.171.41 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CA208D0F319986_808_60D9_FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33706-STANDARD Received: from 72.19.171.41 by FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com (205.188.162.14) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:13:01 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CA208D0F319986-808-3078@FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag: NO ----------MB_8CA208D0F319986_808_60D9_FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" An?apology is in order.? I did not realize that Lancair corrected their lack of a torque spec in a more recent assembly manual update.? (I'm building a 360, not a Legacy, so I don't get the Legacy updates.)? I'm pleassed that they agree it was important. If I caused anyone on the list, or at Lancair, any heartburn by intimating that Lancair was somehow remiss in their responsibilities to tell us how to assemble their airframes, I humbly apologize.? In fact, the updates and service bulletins that I've received over the (way too many) years of building are part of the reason why I'm glad I chose a Lancair over the alternative.? As for the instructions that they do give us, well, I'm amazed at how much better the new manuals are than my 1994 manual, and the 1994 manuals were among the best in the industry at the time. - Rob Wolf ________________________________________________________________________ More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail ! - http://webmail.aol.com ----------MB_8CA208D0F319986_808_60D9_FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
An apology is in order.  I did not realize that Lancair corrected their lack of a torque spec in a more recent assembly manual update.  (I'm building a 360, not a Legacy, so I don't get the Legacy updates.)  I'm pleassed that they agree it was important.

If I caused anyone on the list, or at Lancair, any heartburn by intimating that Lancair was somehow remiss in their responsibilities to tell us how to assemble their airframes, I humbly apologize.  In fact, the updates and service bulletins that I've received over the (way too many) years of building are part of the reason why I'm glad I chose a Lancair over the alternative.  As for the instructions that they do give us, well, I'm amazed at how much better the new manuals are than my 1994 manual, and the 1994 manuals were among the best in the industry at the time.

- Rob Wolf
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!
----------MB_8CA208D0F319986_808_60D9_FWM-D38.sysops.aol.com--